The story of King Ezana’s Obelisk of Axum and its Italian exile represents the epitomic example of the cultural and political implications of relocating architecture. The 4thcentury CE stele in basaltic stone, which stood broken in Axum, modern Ethiopia, was taken as war booty by the Italian troops after the military occupation of 1935. In 1937, the obelisk was transferred to Rome and re-erected in front of the Ministry of Italian Africa, overlooking the Circus Maximus: a graft resulting in cultural contaminations. Ethiopia had been asking for its restitution since 1947, but the stele was returned only in 2005. It was disassembled and reduced again into pieces, then transferred to Ethiopia by three cargo flight. The restitution required the export of Italian technologies and professionals to carry out the re-composition, providing the African country with the necessary knowledge to re-erect the other obelisks lying broken in Axum. From this point of view, the return of the obelisk prompted a process of knowledge transfer, opening new opportunities of cultural cooperation.

D'Amelio, M.g., Colonnese, F., Grieco, L. (2022). The transfer of architectural heritage as a transcultural tool the case of the obelisk of Axum. MOBILE CULTURE STUDIES. THE JOURNAL, 7, 61-78.

The transfer of architectural heritage as a transcultural tool the case of the obelisk of Axum

M. G. D'Amelio
Conceptualization
;
L. Grieco
Conceptualization
2022-01-01

Abstract

The story of King Ezana’s Obelisk of Axum and its Italian exile represents the epitomic example of the cultural and political implications of relocating architecture. The 4thcentury CE stele in basaltic stone, which stood broken in Axum, modern Ethiopia, was taken as war booty by the Italian troops after the military occupation of 1935. In 1937, the obelisk was transferred to Rome and re-erected in front of the Ministry of Italian Africa, overlooking the Circus Maximus: a graft resulting in cultural contaminations. Ethiopia had been asking for its restitution since 1947, but the stele was returned only in 2005. It was disassembled and reduced again into pieces, then transferred to Ethiopia by three cargo flight. The restitution required the export of Italian technologies and professionals to carry out the re-composition, providing the African country with the necessary knowledge to re-erect the other obelisks lying broken in Axum. From this point of view, the return of the obelisk prompted a process of knowledge transfer, opening new opportunities of cultural cooperation.
2022
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore ICAR/18 - STORIA DELL'ARCHITETTURA
English
Technology, Obelisk of Axum, Return of cultural property, Postcolonialism, Structure relocation, Ethiopia
D'Amelio, M.g., Colonnese, F., Grieco, L. (2022). The transfer of architectural heritage as a transcultural tool the case of the obelisk of Axum. MOBILE CULTURE STUDIES. THE JOURNAL, 7, 61-78.
D'Amelio, Mg; Colonnese, F; Grieco, L
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
001 Axum Colonnese DAmelio Grieco.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 6.4 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.4 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/306615
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact