The proliferation of research on innovation-related coopetition calls for a more unified understanding of the current state of knowledge in this domain. Previous reviews on coopetition, however, fall short when it comes to putting innovation at the core of their analysis, often relegating the topic to one of the research themes/dimensions of coopetition, or considering innovation to be a promising area for future research. We fill this gap by systematically reviewing two decades of research on coopetition and innovation. We apply Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) methods to a sample of 128 articles from academic journals published in the field of coopetition and innovation, revealing the major research themes, the theories and methods used, the levels of analysis, and the contexts explored. The holistic representation of coopetition and innovation research hinges upon multiple theories, including the resource-based view, the knowledge-based view, the network view, and the behavioral view, while predominantly focusing on strategy; innovativeness; value creation, appropriation and performance; appropriability and protection; and organizational culture. Given the increasing scholarly interest in both coopetition and innovation, this study proposes fruitful research avenues, and discusses their implications for both theory and practice.

Corbo, L., Kraus, S., Vlacic, B., Dabic, M., Caputo, A., Pellegrini, M. (2023). Coopetition and innovation: A review and research agenda. TECHNOVATION, 122 [10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102624].

Coopetition and innovation: A review and research agenda

Pellegrini M.
2023-01-01

Abstract

The proliferation of research on innovation-related coopetition calls for a more unified understanding of the current state of knowledge in this domain. Previous reviews on coopetition, however, fall short when it comes to putting innovation at the core of their analysis, often relegating the topic to one of the research themes/dimensions of coopetition, or considering innovation to be a promising area for future research. We fill this gap by systematically reviewing two decades of research on coopetition and innovation. We apply Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) methods to a sample of 128 articles from academic journals published in the field of coopetition and innovation, revealing the major research themes, the theories and methods used, the levels of analysis, and the contexts explored. The holistic representation of coopetition and innovation research hinges upon multiple theories, including the resource-based view, the knowledge-based view, the network view, and the behavioral view, while predominantly focusing on strategy; innovativeness; value creation, appropriation and performance; appropriability and protection; and organizational culture. Given the increasing scholarly interest in both coopetition and innovation, this study proposes fruitful research avenues, and discusses their implications for both theory and practice.
2023
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore SECS-P/10 - ORGANIZZAZIONE AZIENDALE
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Coopetition
Innovation
Systematic literature review
Multiple correspondence analysis
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102624
Corbo, L., Kraus, S., Vlacic, B., Dabic, M., Caputo, A., Pellegrini, M. (2023). Coopetition and innovation: A review and research agenda. TECHNOVATION, 122 [10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102624].
Corbo, L; Kraus, S; Vlacic, B; Dabic, M; Caputo, A; Pellegrini, M
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Corbo et al., 2022.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 2.91 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.91 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/306339
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 55
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 49
social impact