The short squeeze of GameStop (GME) shares in mid‐January 2021 has been primarily orchestrated by retail investors of the Reddit r/wallstreetbets community. As such, it represents a paramount example of collective coordination action on social media, resulting in large‐scale consensus formation and significant market impact. In this work we characterise the structure and time evolution of Reddit conversation data, showing that the occurrence and sentiment of GME‐related comments (representing how much users are engaged with GME) increased significantly much before the short squeeze actually took place. Taking inspiration from these early warnings as well as evidence from previous literature, we introduce a model of opinion dynamics where user engagement can trigger a self‐reinforcing mechanism leading to the emergence of consensus, which in this particular case is associated to the success of the short squeeze operation. Analytical solutions and model simulations on interaction networks of Reddit users feature a phase transition from heterogeneous to homogeneous opinions as engagement grows, which we qualitatively compare to the sudden hike of GME stock price. Although the model cannot be validated with available data, it offers a possible and minimal interpretation for the increasingly important phenomenon of self‐organized collective actions taking place on social networks.

Mancini, A., Desiderio, A., Di Clemente, R., Cimini, G. (2022). Self-induced consensus of Reddit users to characterise the GameStop short squeeze. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 12(1) [10.1038/s41598-022-17925-2].

Self-induced consensus of Reddit users to characterise the GameStop short squeeze

Cimini, Giulio
2022-01-01

Abstract

The short squeeze of GameStop (GME) shares in mid‐January 2021 has been primarily orchestrated by retail investors of the Reddit r/wallstreetbets community. As such, it represents a paramount example of collective coordination action on social media, resulting in large‐scale consensus formation and significant market impact. In this work we characterise the structure and time evolution of Reddit conversation data, showing that the occurrence and sentiment of GME‐related comments (representing how much users are engaged with GME) increased significantly much before the short squeeze actually took place. Taking inspiration from these early warnings as well as evidence from previous literature, we introduce a model of opinion dynamics where user engagement can trigger a self‐reinforcing mechanism leading to the emergence of consensus, which in this particular case is associated to the success of the short squeeze operation. Analytical solutions and model simulations on interaction networks of Reddit users feature a phase transition from heterogeneous to homogeneous opinions as engagement grows, which we qualitatively compare to the sudden hike of GME stock price. Although the model cannot be validated with available data, it offers a possible and minimal interpretation for the increasingly important phenomenon of self‐organized collective actions taking place on social networks.
2022
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore FIS/02 - FISICA TEORICA, MODELLI E METODI MATEMATICI
Settore PHYS-02/A - Fisica teorica delle interazioni fondamentali, modelli, metodi matematici e applicazioni
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Mancini, A., Desiderio, A., Di Clemente, R., Cimini, G. (2022). Self-induced consensus of Reddit users to characterise the GameStop short squeeze. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 12(1) [10.1038/s41598-022-17925-2].
Mancini, A; Desiderio, A; Di Clemente, R; Cimini, G
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s41598-022-17925-2.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.44 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.44 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/304715
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact