Road networks are classified as critical infrastructure systems. Their loss of functionality not only hinders residential and commercial activities, but also compromises evacuation and rescue after disasters. Dealing with risks to key strategic objectives is not new to asset management, and risk management is considered one of the core elements of asset management. Risk analysis has recently focused on understanding and designing strategies for resilience, especially in the case of seismic events that present a significant hazard to highway transportation networks. Following a review of risk and resilience concepts and metrics, an innovative methodology to stochastically assess the economic resources needed to restore damaged infrastructures, one that is a relevant and complementary element within a wider resilience-based framework, is proposed. The original methodology is based on collecting and analyzing ex post reconstruction and hazard data and was calibrated on data measured during the earthquake that struck central Italy in 2016 and collected in the following recovery phase. Although further improvements are needed, the proposed approach can be used effectively by road managers to provide useful information in developing seismic retrofitting plans.

Nicolosi, V., Augeri, M., D’Apuzzo, M., Evangelisti, A., Santilli, D. (2022). A probabilistic approach to the evaluation of seismic resilience in road asset management. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE, 13(1), 114-124 [10.1007/s13753-022-00395-5].

A probabilistic approach to the evaluation of seismic resilience in road asset management

Nicolosi V.
;
Augeri M.;
2022-02-01

Abstract

Road networks are classified as critical infrastructure systems. Their loss of functionality not only hinders residential and commercial activities, but also compromises evacuation and rescue after disasters. Dealing with risks to key strategic objectives is not new to asset management, and risk management is considered one of the core elements of asset management. Risk analysis has recently focused on understanding and designing strategies for resilience, especially in the case of seismic events that present a significant hazard to highway transportation networks. Following a review of risk and resilience concepts and metrics, an innovative methodology to stochastically assess the economic resources needed to restore damaged infrastructures, one that is a relevant and complementary element within a wider resilience-based framework, is proposed. The original methodology is based on collecting and analyzing ex post reconstruction and hazard data and was calibrated on data measured during the earthquake that struck central Italy in 2016 and collected in the following recovery phase. Although further improvements are needed, the proposed approach can be used effectively by road managers to provide useful information in developing seismic retrofitting plans.
feb-2022
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore ICAR/04 - STRADE, FERROVIE E AEROPORTI
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-022-00395-5
Nicolosi, V., Augeri, M., D’Apuzzo, M., Evangelisti, A., Santilli, D. (2022). A probabilistic approach to the evaluation of seismic resilience in road asset management. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE, 13(1), 114-124 [10.1007/s13753-022-00395-5].
Nicolosi, V; Augeri, M; D’Apuzzo, M; Evangelisti, A; Santilli, D
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Nicolosi2022_Article_AProbabilisticApproachToTheEva.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 765.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
765.58 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/297367
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact