This study reports the performance of classical molecular dynamics (MD) in predicting the X-ray diffraction patterns of butylammonium nitrate (BAN) and two derivatives, 4-hydroxybutan-1-ammonium nitrate (4-HOBAN) and 4-methoxybutan-1-ammonium nitrate (4-MeOBAN). The structure functions and radial distribution functions obtained from energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction spectra, recorded newly for BAN and for the first time for 4-MeOBAN and 4-HOBAN, are compared with the corresponding quantities calculated from MD trajectories, to access information on the morphology of these liquids. The different behavior of two force fields, a polarizable multipole force field and a fixed-charge one supplemented by an explicit three-body term, is shown. The three-body force field proves to be superior in reproducing the intermediate q range, for which the polarizable force field gives the wrong peak position and intensities. In addition, both models can correctly account for the presence or absence of a low q peak in the scattering patterns.

Campetella, M., Gontrani, L., Leonelli, F., Bencivenni, L., Caminiti, R. (2015). Two different models to predict ionic-liquid diffraction patterns: Fixed-charge versus polarizable potentials. CHEMPHYSCHEM, 16(1), 197-203 [10.1002/cphc.201402577].

Two different models to predict ionic-liquid diffraction patterns: Fixed-charge versus polarizable potentials

Gontrani, L.
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
2015-01-01

Abstract

This study reports the performance of classical molecular dynamics (MD) in predicting the X-ray diffraction patterns of butylammonium nitrate (BAN) and two derivatives, 4-hydroxybutan-1-ammonium nitrate (4-HOBAN) and 4-methoxybutan-1-ammonium nitrate (4-MeOBAN). The structure functions and radial distribution functions obtained from energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction spectra, recorded newly for BAN and for the first time for 4-MeOBAN and 4-HOBAN, are compared with the corresponding quantities calculated from MD trajectories, to access information on the morphology of these liquids. The different behavior of two force fields, a polarizable multipole force field and a fixed-charge one supplemented by an explicit three-body term, is shown. The three-body force field proves to be superior in reproducing the intermediate q range, for which the polarizable force field gives the wrong peak position and intensities. In addition, both models can correctly account for the presence or absence of a low q peak in the scattering patterns.
2015
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore CHIM/02 - CHIMICA FISICA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
ionic liquids; molecular dynamics; polarizable force field; three-body force field; X-ray diffraction
Campetella, M., Gontrani, L., Leonelli, F., Bencivenni, L., Caminiti, R. (2015). Two different models to predict ionic-liquid diffraction patterns: Fixed-charge versus polarizable potentials. CHEMPHYSCHEM, 16(1), 197-203 [10.1002/cphc.201402577].
Campetella, M; Gontrani, L; Leonelli, F; Bencivenni, L; Caminiti, R
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
appo.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 1.32 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.32 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/294621
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact