Many studies have demonstrated that pulsed ultrasound combined with circulating microbubbles can permeate the blood-brain barrier in a reversible manner. In 2012, our group demonstrated that the BBB remains permeable to small MRI contrast agents up to 24 h after ultrasound application and also that this duration was dependent on nanoparticle size. We derived a simple theoretical model explaining these observations (Marty et al 2012 J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 32 1948-58). However, in this original paper the expression of the BBB closure time (t(1/2)) as a function of the size of delivered contrast agents (d(H)) could not be mathematically derived from the model but rather from a guessed function that is fit to the numerical solution of the model. In this context, the two numeric parameters of this fitting function could not be related to the other physical parameters of the model. Here, we present a formal solution, finding the same expression of t(1/2) in already published and linking t(1/2) to relevant physical variables such as the molecular hydrodynamic diameter d(H), the BBB closure rate k and the standard deviation of the initial BBB gap sizes distribution sigma(0).

Conti, A., Meriaux, S., Larrat, B. (2019). About the Marty model of blood-brain barrier closure after its disruption using focused ultrasound. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY, 64(14), 14NT02 [10.1088/1361-6560/ab259d].

About the Marty model of blood-brain barrier closure after its disruption using focused ultrasound

Conti A.;
2019-07-01

Abstract

Many studies have demonstrated that pulsed ultrasound combined with circulating microbubbles can permeate the blood-brain barrier in a reversible manner. In 2012, our group demonstrated that the BBB remains permeable to small MRI contrast agents up to 24 h after ultrasound application and also that this duration was dependent on nanoparticle size. We derived a simple theoretical model explaining these observations (Marty et al 2012 J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 32 1948-58). However, in this original paper the expression of the BBB closure time (t(1/2)) as a function of the size of delivered contrast agents (d(H)) could not be mathematically derived from the model but rather from a guessed function that is fit to the numerical solution of the model. In this context, the two numeric parameters of this fitting function could not be related to the other physical parameters of the model. Here, we present a formal solution, finding the same expression of t(1/2) in already published and linking t(1/2) to relevant physical variables such as the molecular hydrodynamic diameter d(H), the BBB closure rate k and the standard deviation of the initial BBB gap sizes distribution sigma(0).
lug-2019
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore FIS/07 - FISICA APPLICATA (A BENI CULTURALI, AMBIENTALI, BIOLOGIA E MEDICINA)
English
BBB disruption
ultrasound
brain drug delivery
Blood-Brain Barrier
Brain
Contrast Media
Drug Delivery Systems
Humans
Hyperthermia, Induced
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Microbubbles
Ultrasonography
Models, Statistical
Conti, A., Meriaux, S., Larrat, B. (2019). About the Marty model of blood-brain barrier closure after its disruption using focused ultrasound. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY, 64(14), 14NT02 [10.1088/1361-6560/ab259d].
Conti, A; Meriaux, S; Larrat, B
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Allegato A7.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 591.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
591.42 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/292506
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact