In Schwichtenberg (Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, vol 90, Elsevier, pp 867-895, 1977), Schwichtenberg fine-tuned Tait's technique (Tait in The syntax and semantics of infinitary languages, Springer, pp 204-236, 1968) so as to provide a simplified version of Gentzen's original cut-elimination procedure for first-order classical logic (Gallier in Logic for computer science: foundations of automatic theorem proving, Courier Dover Publications, London, 2015). In this note we show that, limited to the case of classical propositional logic, the Tait-Schwichtenberg algorithm allows for a further simplification. The procedure offered here is implemented on Kleene's sequent system G4 (Kleene in Mathematical logic, Wiley, New York, 1967; Smullyan in First-order logic, Courier corporation, London, 1995). The specific formulation of the logical rules for G4 allows us to provide bounds on the height of cut-free proofs just in terms of the logical complexity of their end-sequent.
Pulcini, G. (2022). A note on cut-elimination for classical propositional logic. ARCHIVE FOR MATHEMATICAL LOGIC, 61(3-4), 555-565 [10.1007/s00153-021-00800-8].
A note on cut-elimination for classical propositional logic
Pulcini G.
2022-01-01
Abstract
In Schwichtenberg (Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, vol 90, Elsevier, pp 867-895, 1977), Schwichtenberg fine-tuned Tait's technique (Tait in The syntax and semantics of infinitary languages, Springer, pp 204-236, 1968) so as to provide a simplified version of Gentzen's original cut-elimination procedure for first-order classical logic (Gallier in Logic for computer science: foundations of automatic theorem proving, Courier Dover Publications, London, 2015). In this note we show that, limited to the case of classical propositional logic, the Tait-Schwichtenberg algorithm allows for a further simplification. The procedure offered here is implemented on Kleene's sequent system G4 (Kleene in Mathematical logic, Wiley, New York, 1967; Smullyan in First-order logic, Courier corporation, London, 1995). The specific formulation of the logical rules for G4 allows us to provide bounds on the height of cut-free proofs just in terms of the logical complexity of their end-sequent.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Pulcini2021_Article_ANoteOnCut-eliminationForClass.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
258.17 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
258.17 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.