In Schwichtenberg (Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, vol 90, Elsevier, pp 867-895, 1977), Schwichtenberg fine-tuned Tait's technique (Tait in The syntax and semantics of infinitary languages, Springer, pp 204-236, 1968) so as to provide a simplified version of Gentzen's original cut-elimination procedure for first-order classical logic (Gallier in Logic for computer science: foundations of automatic theorem proving, Courier Dover Publications, London, 2015). In this note we show that, limited to the case of classical propositional logic, the Tait-Schwichtenberg algorithm allows for a further simplification. The procedure offered here is implemented on Kleene's sequent system G4 (Kleene in Mathematical logic, Wiley, New York, 1967; Smullyan in First-order logic, Courier corporation, London, 1995). The specific formulation of the logical rules for G4 allows us to provide bounds on the height of cut-free proofs just in terms of the logical complexity of their end-sequent.

Pulcini, G. (2021). A note on cut-elimination for classical propositional logic. ARCHIVE FOR MATHEMATICAL LOGIC [10.1007/s00153-021-00800-8].

A note on cut-elimination for classical propositional logic

Pulcini G.
2021-01-01

Abstract

In Schwichtenberg (Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, vol 90, Elsevier, pp 867-895, 1977), Schwichtenberg fine-tuned Tait's technique (Tait in The syntax and semantics of infinitary languages, Springer, pp 204-236, 1968) so as to provide a simplified version of Gentzen's original cut-elimination procedure for first-order classical logic (Gallier in Logic for computer science: foundations of automatic theorem proving, Courier Dover Publications, London, 2015). In this note we show that, limited to the case of classical propositional logic, the Tait-Schwichtenberg algorithm allows for a further simplification. The procedure offered here is implemented on Kleene's sequent system G4 (Kleene in Mathematical logic, Wiley, New York, 1967; Smullyan in First-order logic, Courier corporation, London, 1995). The specific formulation of the logical rules for G4 allows us to provide bounds on the height of cut-free proofs just in terms of the logical complexity of their end-sequent.
2021
Online ahead of print
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore M-FIL/02 - LOGICA E FILOSOFIA DELLA SCIENZA
Settore MAT/01 - LOGICA MATEMATICA
Settore INF/01 - INFORMATICA
English
Classical propositional logic
Sequent calculus
Cut elimination
Pulcini, G. (2021). A note on cut-elimination for classical propositional logic. ARCHIVE FOR MATHEMATICAL LOGIC [10.1007/s00153-021-00800-8].
Pulcini, G
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pulcini2021_Article_ANoteOnCut-eliminationForClass.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 258.17 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
258.17 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/284904
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact