Aim: To compare trimodality therapy (TMT) versus radical cystectomy (RC) and develop GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Recommendation by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) for treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Material and methods: Prospective and retrospective studies comparing TMT and RC for MIBC patients were included. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of evidence was made. Results: Ten studies were included in the analysis. Pooled analysis showed salvage cystectomy and pathological complete response rates after TMT of 12 % and 72-77.5 %, respectively. Pooled rates of G3-G4 GU toxicity and serious toxicity rate were 18 vs 3% and 45 vs 29 % for patients undergoing TMT vs RC, respectively. The panel assessed a substantial equivalence in terms of OS and CSS at 5 years between TMT and RC. Conclusions: TMT could be suggested as an alternative treatment to RC in non-metastatic MIBC patients, deemed fit for surgery.

Francolini, G., Borghesi, S., Fersino, S., Magli, A., Jereczek-Fossa, B.a., Cristinelli, L., et al. (2021). Treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in patients without comorbidities and fit for surgery: Trimodality therapy vs radical cystectomy. Development of GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) recommendation by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY/HEMATOLOGY, 159, 103235 [10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103235].

Treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in patients without comorbidities and fit for surgery: Trimodality therapy vs radical cystectomy. Development of GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) recommendation by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO)

D'Angelillo, Rolando M
2021-03-01

Abstract

Aim: To compare trimodality therapy (TMT) versus radical cystectomy (RC) and develop GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Recommendation by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) for treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Material and methods: Prospective and retrospective studies comparing TMT and RC for MIBC patients were included. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of evidence was made. Results: Ten studies were included in the analysis. Pooled analysis showed salvage cystectomy and pathological complete response rates after TMT of 12 % and 72-77.5 %, respectively. Pooled rates of G3-G4 GU toxicity and serious toxicity rate were 18 vs 3% and 45 vs 29 % for patients undergoing TMT vs RC, respectively. The panel assessed a substantial equivalence in terms of OS and CSS at 5 years between TMT and RC. Conclusions: TMT could be suggested as an alternative treatment to RC in non-metastatic MIBC patients, deemed fit for surgery.
mar-2021
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Recensione
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/36 - DIAGNOSTICA PER IMMAGINI E RADIOTERAPIA
Settore MED/06 - ONCOLOGIA MEDICA
English
Bladder cancer
Muscle-invasive
Surgery
Trimodality therapy
Humans
Italy
Medical Oncology
Muscles
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Cystectomy
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Francolini, G., Borghesi, S., Fersino, S., Magli, A., Jereczek-Fossa, B.a., Cristinelli, L., et al. (2021). Treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in patients without comorbidities and fit for surgery: Trimodality therapy vs radical cystectomy. Development of GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) recommendation by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY/HEMATOLOGY, 159, 103235 [10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103235].
Francolini, G; Borghesi, S; Fersino, S; Magli, A; Jereczek-Fossa, Ba; Cristinelli, L; Rizzo, M; Corvò, R; Pappagallo, Gl; Arcangeli, S; Magrini, Sm; D'Angelillo, Rm
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/283152
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact