Cultural innovation” sounds like an oxymoron. It is not, though. It is something real that tops up social and technological innovation. How can we measure “cultural innovation”? The answer is, as a result of co-creation. Items of cultural innovation are: content providers such as museums, science centres and libraries, as well as processes triggered by issues such as cosmopolitanism, inclusiveness, mobility, migration, heritage and creativity. Valuating the impact is fundamental to improve societal acceptance of public investment in culture, because these measurements may provide a basis for aligning research and innovation with the values, needs and expectations of society. In recent years, it has become clear that co-creation plays a central role within open innovation, because a “specific innovation can no longer be seen as the result of predefined and isolated innovation activities but rather as the outcome of a complex co-creation process involving knowledge flows across the entire economic and social environment” (Open Science, Open Innovation, Open to the World. EC 2016, p. 11). The paper offers migration-relate case studies for evaluating the impact of cultural innovation in societies that aim at being innovative, reflective and inclusive.

Pozzo, R. (2019). Innovation for the Reflective Society. PLATTFORM FORSCHUNGS- UND TECHNOLOGIEEVALUIERUNG, 46, 53-55 [10.22163/fteval.2019.367].

Innovation for the Reflective Society

Pozzo, Riccardo
2019-03-12

Abstract

Cultural innovation” sounds like an oxymoron. It is not, though. It is something real that tops up social and technological innovation. How can we measure “cultural innovation”? The answer is, as a result of co-creation. Items of cultural innovation are: content providers such as museums, science centres and libraries, as well as processes triggered by issues such as cosmopolitanism, inclusiveness, mobility, migration, heritage and creativity. Valuating the impact is fundamental to improve societal acceptance of public investment in culture, because these measurements may provide a basis for aligning research and innovation with the values, needs and expectations of society. In recent years, it has become clear that co-creation plays a central role within open innovation, because a “specific innovation can no longer be seen as the result of predefined and isolated innovation activities but rather as the outcome of a complex co-creation process involving knowledge flows across the entire economic and social environment” (Open Science, Open Innovation, Open to the World. EC 2016, p. 11). The paper offers migration-relate case studies for evaluating the impact of cultural innovation in societies that aim at being innovative, reflective and inclusive.
12-mar-2019
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore SPS/08 - SOCIOLOGIA DEI PROCESSI CULTURALI E COMUNICATIVI
English
Open Innovatio, Cultural Innovation, Reflection, Inclusion
Pozzo, R. (2019). Innovation for the Reflective Society. PLATTFORM FORSCHUNGS- UND TECHNOLOGIEEVALUIERUNG, 46, 53-55 [10.22163/fteval.2019.367].
Pozzo, R
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Journal48_10.22163_fteval.2019.367.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: FTEVAL
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 673.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
673.73 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/282467
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact