Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an important biomarker in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that is used for prognostic, predictive, monitoring, and efficacy-response assessments. The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) MRD working party evaluates standardization and harmonization of MRD in an ongoing manner and has updated the 2018 ELN MRD recommendations based on significant developments in the field. New and revised recommendations were established during in-person and online meetings, and a two-stage Delphi poll was conducted to optimize consensus. All recommendations are graded by levels of evidence and agreement. Major changes include technical specifications for next generation sequencing (NGS)-based MRD testing and integrative assessments of MRD irrespective of technology. Other topics include use of MRD as a prognostic and surrogate endpoint for drug testing; selection of the technique, material, and appropriate time points for MRD assessment; and clinical implications of MRD assessment. In addition to technical recommendations for flow- and molecular- MRD analysis, we provide MRD thresholds and define MRD response, and detail how MRD results should be reported and combined if several techniques are used. MRD assessment in AML is complex and clinically relevant, and standardized approaches to application, interpretation, technical conduct, and reporting are of critical importance.

Heuser, M., Freeman, S.d., Ossenkoppele, G.j., Buccisano, F., Hourigan, C.s., Ngai, L.l., et al. (2021). 2021 update measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia: European leukemia net working party consensus document. BLOOD, 138(26), 2753-2767 [10.1182/blood.2021013626].

2021 update measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia: European leukemia net working party consensus document

Buccisano, Francesco;Venditti, Adriano;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an important biomarker in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that is used for prognostic, predictive, monitoring, and efficacy-response assessments. The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) MRD working party evaluates standardization and harmonization of MRD in an ongoing manner and has updated the 2018 ELN MRD recommendations based on significant developments in the field. New and revised recommendations were established during in-person and online meetings, and a two-stage Delphi poll was conducted to optimize consensus. All recommendations are graded by levels of evidence and agreement. Major changes include technical specifications for next generation sequencing (NGS)-based MRD testing and integrative assessments of MRD irrespective of technology. Other topics include use of MRD as a prognostic and surrogate endpoint for drug testing; selection of the technique, material, and appropriate time points for MRD assessment; and clinical implications of MRD assessment. In addition to technical recommendations for flow- and molecular- MRD analysis, we provide MRD thresholds and define MRD response, and detail how MRD results should be reported and combined if several techniques are used. MRD assessment in AML is complex and clinically relevant, and standardized approaches to application, interpretation, technical conduct, and reporting are of critical importance.
2021
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/15 - MALATTIE DEL SANGUE
English
Heuser, M., Freeman, S.d., Ossenkoppele, G.j., Buccisano, F., Hourigan, C.s., Ngai, L.l., et al. (2021). 2021 update measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia: European leukemia net working party consensus document. BLOOD, 138(26), 2753-2767 [10.1182/blood.2021013626].
Heuser, M; Freeman, Sd; Ossenkoppele, Gj; Buccisano, F; Hourigan, Cs; Ngai, Ll; Tettero, Jm; Bachas, C; Baer, C; Béné, Mc; Buecklein, V; Czyz, A; De...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/281268
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 202
  • Scopus 369
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 349
social impact