The goal of this study was to determine the degree of consensus in the management of spinal cord tethering (TC) in patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) in a large cohort of European pediatric centers.A survey was sent to pediatric surgeons (one per center) members of the ARM-Net Consortium.Twenty-four (86%) from ten different countries completed the survey. Overall prevalence of TC was: 21% unknown, 46% below 15, and 29% between 15 and 30%. Ninety-six agreed on screening all patients for TC regardless the type of ARM and 79% start screening at birth. Responses varied in TC definition and diagnostic tools. Fifty percent of respondents prefer ultrasound (US), 21% indicate either US or magnetic resonance (MRI) based on a pre-defined risk of presenting TC, and 21% perform both. Discrepancy exists in complementary test: 82% carry out urodynamic studies (UDS) and only 37% perform somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP). Prophylactic untethering is performed in only two centers (8%).Survey results support TC screening in all patients with ARM and conservative management of TC. There is discrepancy in the definition of TC, screening tools, and complementary test. Protocols should be developed to avoid such variability in management.

Fanjul, M., Samuk, I., Bagolan, P., Leva, E., Sloots, C., Gine, C., et al. (2017). Tethered cord in patients affected by anorectal malformations: a survey from the ARM-Net Consortium. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 33(8), 849-854 [10.1007/s00383-017-4105-4].

Tethered cord in patients affected by anorectal malformations: a survey from the ARM-Net Consortium

Bagolan P.;Giuliani S.;
2017-01-01

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the degree of consensus in the management of spinal cord tethering (TC) in patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) in a large cohort of European pediatric centers.A survey was sent to pediatric surgeons (one per center) members of the ARM-Net Consortium.Twenty-four (86%) from ten different countries completed the survey. Overall prevalence of TC was: 21% unknown, 46% below 15, and 29% between 15 and 30%. Ninety-six agreed on screening all patients for TC regardless the type of ARM and 79% start screening at birth. Responses varied in TC definition and diagnostic tools. Fifty percent of respondents prefer ultrasound (US), 21% indicate either US or magnetic resonance (MRI) based on a pre-defined risk of presenting TC, and 21% perform both. Discrepancy exists in complementary test: 82% carry out urodynamic studies (UDS) and only 37% perform somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP). Prophylactic untethering is performed in only two centers (8%).Survey results support TC screening in all patients with ARM and conservative management of TC. There is discrepancy in the definition of TC, screening tools, and complementary test. Protocols should be developed to avoid such variability in management.
2017
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/20 - CHIRURGIA PEDIATRICA E INFANTILE
English
Anorectal malformation
Tethered cord
Neurosurgery
Arm-Net Consortium
Fanjul, M., Samuk, I., Bagolan, P., Leva, E., Sloots, C., Gine, C., et al. (2017). Tethered cord in patients affected by anorectal malformations: a survey from the ARM-Net Consortium. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 33(8), 849-854 [10.1007/s00383-017-4105-4].
Fanjul, M; Samuk, I; Bagolan, P; Leva, E; Sloots, C; Gine, C; Aminoff, D; Midrio, P; Deluggi, S; Fascetti Leon, F; Garcia, A; Giuliani, S; Grano, C; Grasshoff-Derr, S; Haanen, M; Holland-Cunz, S; Jenetzky, E; Lacher, M; Lisi, G; Makedonsky, I; Marcelis, C; Miserez, M; Ozen, O; Percin, F; Reutter, H; Rohleder, S; Schmiedeke, E; Schwarzer, N; Sloots, P; Stenstrom, P; Till, H; Van der Steeg, L; Van Rooij, I; Volk, P; Wester, T; Zwink, N; De Blaauw, I
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tethered cord in patients affected by anorectal malformations.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 513.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
513.99 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/274509
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact