Inclusive design approaches like universal design prescribe addressing the needs of the widest possible audience in order to consider human differences. Taking differences seriously, however, may imply that "the widest possible audience" is severely restricted. In confronting this paradox, we recruit Rawls' theory of justice as fairness. Applying Rawls' principles to universal design implies that users derive which design allows for equitable use by deliberating under a veil of ignorance concerning their own capacities or limitations. Rather than addressing everyone's needs, being designed universally then means matching what everyone would choose under the condition sketched. Since this can hardly apply to single artefacts, we suggest considering the social distribution of usability as the proper domain of fairness in design instead. Under this reading, just design concerns how usability is distributed across relevant users. Differences in usability are acceptable if overall usability for the worst offs is maximized.

Bianchin, M., Heylighen, A. (2017). Fair by design : Addressing the paradox of inclusive design approaches. In L.I. Loredana Di Lucchio (a cura di), Design for Next: Proceedings of the 12th European Academy of Design Conference (pp. S3162-S3170). Taylor and Francis Ltd. [10.1080/14606925.2017.1352822].

Fair by design : Addressing the paradox of inclusive design approaches

Bianchin, M;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Inclusive design approaches like universal design prescribe addressing the needs of the widest possible audience in order to consider human differences. Taking differences seriously, however, may imply that "the widest possible audience" is severely restricted. In confronting this paradox, we recruit Rawls' theory of justice as fairness. Applying Rawls' principles to universal design implies that users derive which design allows for equitable use by deliberating under a veil of ignorance concerning their own capacities or limitations. Rather than addressing everyone's needs, being designed universally then means matching what everyone would choose under the condition sketched. Since this can hardly apply to single artefacts, we suggest considering the social distribution of usability as the proper domain of fairness in design instead. Under this reading, just design concerns how usability is distributed across relevant users. Differences in usability are acceptable if overall usability for the worst offs is maximized.
2017
Settore M-FIL/01 - FILOSOFIA TEORETICA
English
Rilevanza internazionale
Capitolo o saggio
Universal Design
Inclusive Design
Justice
Bianchin, M., Heylighen, A. (2017). Fair by design : Addressing the paradox of inclusive design approaches. In L.I. Loredana Di Lucchio (a cura di), Design for Next: Proceedings of the 12th European Academy of Design Conference (pp. S3162-S3170). Taylor and Francis Ltd. [10.1080/14606925.2017.1352822].
Bianchin, M; Heylighen, A
Contributo in libro
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/273096
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact