A consensus has not yet been reached regarding the accuracy of people with schizophrenia in self-reporting their real-life functioning. In a large (n = 618) cohort of stable, community-dwelling schizophrenia patients we sought to: (1) examine the concordance of patients' reports of their real-life functioning with the reports of their key caregiver; (2) identify which patient characteristics are associated to the differences between patients and informants. Patient-caregiver concordance of the ratings in three Specific Level of Functioning Scale (SLOF) domains (interpersonal relationships, everyday life skills, work skills) was evaluated with matched-pair t tests, the Lin's concordance correlation, Somers' D, and Bland-Altman plots with limits of agreement (LOA). Predictors of the patient-caregiver differences in SLOF ratings were assessed with a linear regression with multivariable fractional polynomials. Patients' self-evaluation of functioning was higher than caregivers' in all the evaluated domains of the SLOF and 17.6% of the patients exceeded the LOA, thus providing a self-evaluation discordant from their key caregivers. The strongest predictors of patient-caregiver discrepancies were caregivers' ratings in each SLOF domain. In clinically stable outpatients with a moderate degree of functional impairment, self-evaluation with the SLOF scale can become a useful, informative and reliable clinical tool to design a tailored rehabilitation program.

Rocca, P., Brasso, C., Montemagni, C., Bellino, S., Rossi, A., Bertolino, A., et al. (2021). Accuracy of self-assessment of real-life functioning in schizophrenia. NPJ SCHIZOPHRENIA, 7(1), 11 [10.1038/s41537-021-00140-9].

Accuracy of self-assessment of real-life functioning in schizophrenia

Rossi, Rodolfo;Siracusano, Alberto;Di Lorenzo, Giorgio;Niolu, Cinzia;Ribolsi, Michele
2021-02-15

Abstract

A consensus has not yet been reached regarding the accuracy of people with schizophrenia in self-reporting their real-life functioning. In a large (n = 618) cohort of stable, community-dwelling schizophrenia patients we sought to: (1) examine the concordance of patients' reports of their real-life functioning with the reports of their key caregiver; (2) identify which patient characteristics are associated to the differences between patients and informants. Patient-caregiver concordance of the ratings in three Specific Level of Functioning Scale (SLOF) domains (interpersonal relationships, everyday life skills, work skills) was evaluated with matched-pair t tests, the Lin's concordance correlation, Somers' D, and Bland-Altman plots with limits of agreement (LOA). Predictors of the patient-caregiver differences in SLOF ratings were assessed with a linear regression with multivariable fractional polynomials. Patients' self-evaluation of functioning was higher than caregivers' in all the evaluated domains of the SLOF and 17.6% of the patients exceeded the LOA, thus providing a self-evaluation discordant from their key caregivers. The strongest predictors of patient-caregiver discrepancies were caregivers' ratings in each SLOF domain. In clinically stable outpatients with a moderate degree of functional impairment, self-evaluation with the SLOF scale can become a useful, informative and reliable clinical tool to design a tailored rehabilitation program.
15-feb-2021
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/25 - PSICHIATRIA
English
Rocca, P., Brasso, C., Montemagni, C., Bellino, S., Rossi, A., Bertolino, A., et al. (2021). Accuracy of self-assessment of real-life functioning in schizophrenia. NPJ SCHIZOPHRENIA, 7(1), 11 [10.1038/s41537-021-00140-9].
Rocca, P; Brasso, C; Montemagni, C; Bellino, S; Rossi, A; Bertolino, A; Gibertoni, D; Aguglia, E; Amore, M; Andriola, I; Bellomo, A; Bucci, P; Buzzanc...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/271608
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact