Background COVID-19 pandemic presented an unexpected challenge for the surgical community in general and Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) specialists in particular. This document aims to summarize recent evidence and experts' opinion and formulate recommendations to guide the surgical community on how to best organize the recovery plan for surgical activity across different sub-specialities after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Recommendations were developed through a Delphi process for establishment of expert consensus. Domain topics were formulated and subsequently subdivided into questions pertinent to different surgical specialities following the COVID-19 crisis. Sixty-five experts from 24 countries, representing the entire EAES board, were invited. Fifty clinicians and six engineers accepted the invitation and drafted statements based on specific key questions. Anonymous voting on the statements was performed until consensus was achieved, defined by at least 70% agreement. Results A total of 92 consensus statements were formulated with regard to safe resumption of surgery across eight domains, addressing general surgery, upper GI, lower GI, bariatrics, endocrine, HPB, abdominal wall and technology/research. The statements addressed elective and emergency services across all subspecialties with specific attention to the role of MIS during the recovery plan. Eighty-four of the statements were approved during the first round of Delphi voting (91.3%) and another 8 during the following round after substantial modification, resulting in a 100% consensus. Conclusion The recommendations formulated by the EAES board establish a framework for resumption of surgery following COVID-19 pandemic with particular focus on the role of MIS across surgical specialities. The statements have the potential for wide application in the clinical setting, education activities and research work across different healthcare systems.

Arezzo, A., Francis, N., Mintz, Y., Adamina, M., Antoniou, S.a., Bouvy, N., et al. (2021). EAES Recommendations for Recovery Plan in Minimally Invasive Surgery Amid COVID-19 Pandemic. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY, 35(1), 1-17 [10.1007/s00464-020-08131-0].

EAES Recommendations for Recovery Plan in Minimally Invasive Surgery Amid COVID-19 Pandemic

Di Lorenzo N.;Fuchs H.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Background COVID-19 pandemic presented an unexpected challenge for the surgical community in general and Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) specialists in particular. This document aims to summarize recent evidence and experts' opinion and formulate recommendations to guide the surgical community on how to best organize the recovery plan for surgical activity across different sub-specialities after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Recommendations were developed through a Delphi process for establishment of expert consensus. Domain topics were formulated and subsequently subdivided into questions pertinent to different surgical specialities following the COVID-19 crisis. Sixty-five experts from 24 countries, representing the entire EAES board, were invited. Fifty clinicians and six engineers accepted the invitation and drafted statements based on specific key questions. Anonymous voting on the statements was performed until consensus was achieved, defined by at least 70% agreement. Results A total of 92 consensus statements were formulated with regard to safe resumption of surgery across eight domains, addressing general surgery, upper GI, lower GI, bariatrics, endocrine, HPB, abdominal wall and technology/research. The statements addressed elective and emergency services across all subspecialties with specific attention to the role of MIS during the recovery plan. Eighty-four of the statements were approved during the first round of Delphi voting (91.3%) and another 8 during the following round after substantial modification, resulting in a 100% consensus. Conclusion The recommendations formulated by the EAES board establish a framework for resumption of surgery following COVID-19 pandemic with particular focus on the role of MIS across surgical specialities. The statements have the potential for wide application in the clinical setting, education activities and research work across different healthcare systems.
2021
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/18 - CHIRURGIA GENERALE
English
COVID-19
Delphi consensus
EAES guidance
Minimally invasive surgery
Priority
Delphi Technique
Elective Surgical Procedures
Emergencies
Global Health
Health Care Rationing
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Infection Control
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Pandemics
SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
Arezzo, A., Francis, N., Mintz, Y., Adamina, M., Antoniou, S.a., Bouvy, N., et al. (2021). EAES Recommendations for Recovery Plan in Minimally Invasive Surgery Amid COVID-19 Pandemic. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY, 35(1), 1-17 [10.1007/s00464-020-08131-0].
Arezzo, A; Francis, N; Mintz, Y; Adamina, M; Antoniou, Sa; Bouvy, N; Copaescu, C; de Manzini, N; Di Lorenzo, N; Morales-Conde, S; Muller-Stich, Bp; Nickel, F; Popa, D; Tait, D; Thomas, C; Nimmo, S; Paraskevis, D; Pietrabissa, A; Eck, M; Letic, E; Preda, Sd; Tsai, A; Malanowska, E; Lesko, D; Majewski, W; Baldari, L; Morelli, L; Shamiyeh, A; Faria, G; Carrano, Fm; Mysliwiec, P; Ahlberg, G; Cassinotti, E; Delibegovic, S; Martinek, L; Yiannakopoulou, E; Gorter-Stam, M; Gorter-Stam, M; Hanna, G; Fuchs, H; Bjelovic, M; Markar, S; Yan, Pw; Chiu, ; Ecom, Bw; Kim, Y-; Ponz, Cb; Schijven, M; Boni, L; Carus, T; Theodoropoulos, G; Forgione, A; Milone, M; Petz, Wlr; Andrejevic, P; Ignjatovic, D; Arulampalam, T; Campbell, K; Chand, M; Coleman, M; Kontovounisios, C; Sagiv, C; Ficuciello, F; Marconi, S; Mascagni, P; Nakajima, K; Margallo, Fms; Horeman, T; Mylonas, G; Valdastri, P
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Arezzo_et_al-2020-Surgical_Endoscopy.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 773.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
773.79 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/268890
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact