A semi-analytical approach is proposed for addressing the minimum thrust and minimum thickness analysis of spherical masonry domes under their self-weight. The classical differential equilibrium equations of axially symmetric shells are resorted to, calling for the exact computation of self-weight and center of mass of an infinitesimal dome voussoir. The minimum thrust analysis is accomplished by determining a statically admissible stress state in the dome, that is associated to a kinematically admissible settlement mechanism of minimum thrust. Such a stress state entails vanishing hoop stresses in the lower part of the dome, where the opening of meridional cracks occurs. An original numerical scheme is proposed for automatically computing a distribution of hoop stresses in the dome cap, producing a statically admissible stress state. A suitable modification of the semi-analytical procedure for the minimum thrust analysis is then adopted to perform the minimum thickness analysis. Numerical results are presented for spherical domes with parameterized oculus and embrace angles, complemented by the comparison with alternative equilibrium models, and with approximate treatments of the dome self-weight adopted in the literature. The merit of the proposed procedure is finally proved in application to a real case. As an iconic result, a refined estimate of the minimum thickness of a hemispherical dome is derived, resulting in 0.04284 times the radius of the mid-surface.

Nodargi, N.a., Bisegna, P. (2021). Minimum thrust and minimum thickness of spherical masonry domes: A semi-analytical approach. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS. A, SOLIDS, 87, 104222 [10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104222].

Minimum thrust and minimum thickness of spherical masonry domes: A semi-analytical approach

Nodargi N. A.
;
Bisegna P.
2021-01-01

Abstract

A semi-analytical approach is proposed for addressing the minimum thrust and minimum thickness analysis of spherical masonry domes under their self-weight. The classical differential equilibrium equations of axially symmetric shells are resorted to, calling for the exact computation of self-weight and center of mass of an infinitesimal dome voussoir. The minimum thrust analysis is accomplished by determining a statically admissible stress state in the dome, that is associated to a kinematically admissible settlement mechanism of minimum thrust. Such a stress state entails vanishing hoop stresses in the lower part of the dome, where the opening of meridional cracks occurs. An original numerical scheme is proposed for automatically computing a distribution of hoop stresses in the dome cap, producing a statically admissible stress state. A suitable modification of the semi-analytical procedure for the minimum thrust analysis is then adopted to perform the minimum thickness analysis. Numerical results are presented for spherical domes with parameterized oculus and embrace angles, complemented by the comparison with alternative equilibrium models, and with approximate treatments of the dome self-weight adopted in the literature. The merit of the proposed procedure is finally proved in application to a real case. As an iconic result, a refined estimate of the minimum thickness of a hemispherical dome is derived, resulting in 0.04284 times the radius of the mid-surface.
2021
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore ICAR/08 - SCIENZA DELLE COSTRUZIONI
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Masonry; Dome; Limit analysis; Shell theory; Thrust surface; Minimum thickness;
Nodargi, N.a., Bisegna, P. (2021). Minimum thrust and minimum thickness of spherical masonry domes: A semi-analytical approach. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS. A, SOLIDS, 87, 104222 [10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104222].
Nodargi, Na; Bisegna, P
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/265855
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact