What is the state-of-the-art literature regarding the adoption of the complexity theory (CT) in engineering management (EM)? What implications can be derived for future research and practices concerning sustainability issues? In this conceptual article, we critically discuss the current status of complexity research in EM. In this regard, we use IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, because it is currently considered the leading journal in EM, and is as a reliable, heuristic proxy. From this journal, we analyze 38 representative publications on the topic published since 2000, and extrapolated through a rigorous keyword-based article search. In particular, we show that: (1) the adoption of CT has been associated with a wide range of key themes in EM, such as new product development, supply chain, and project management. (2) The adoption of CT has been witnessed in an increasing amount of publications, with a focus on conceptual modeling based on fuzzy logics, stochastic, or agent-based modeling prevailing. (3) Many key features of CT seem to be quite clearly observable in our dataset, with modeling and optimizing decision making, under uncertainty, as the dominant theme. However, only a limited number of studies appear to formally adhere to CT, to explain the dierent EM issues investigated. Thus, we derive various implications for EM research (concerning the research in and practice on sustainability issues).

Abatecola, G., Surace, A. (2020). Discussing the use of complexity theory in engineering management: Implications for sustainability. SUSTAINABILITY, 12(24), 10629 [10.3390/su122410629].

Discussing the use of complexity theory in engineering management: Implications for sustainability

Abatecola G.
;
2020-12-01

Abstract

What is the state-of-the-art literature regarding the adoption of the complexity theory (CT) in engineering management (EM)? What implications can be derived for future research and practices concerning sustainability issues? In this conceptual article, we critically discuss the current status of complexity research in EM. In this regard, we use IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, because it is currently considered the leading journal in EM, and is as a reliable, heuristic proxy. From this journal, we analyze 38 representative publications on the topic published since 2000, and extrapolated through a rigorous keyword-based article search. In particular, we show that: (1) the adoption of CT has been associated with a wide range of key themes in EM, such as new product development, supply chain, and project management. (2) The adoption of CT has been witnessed in an increasing amount of publications, with a focus on conceptual modeling based on fuzzy logics, stochastic, or agent-based modeling prevailing. (3) Many key features of CT seem to be quite clearly observable in our dataset, with modeling and optimizing decision making, under uncertainty, as the dominant theme. However, only a limited number of studies appear to formally adhere to CT, to explain the dierent EM issues investigated. Thus, we derive various implications for EM research (concerning the research in and practice on sustainability issues).
dic-2020
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore SECS-P/08 - ECONOMIA E GESTIONE DELLE IMPRESE
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
complexity theory; engineering management; management; sustainability; conceptual
Abatecola, G., Surace, A. (2020). Discussing the use of complexity theory in engineering management: Implications for sustainability. SUSTAINABILITY, 12(24), 10629 [10.3390/su122410629].
Abatecola, G; Surace, A
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Abatecola_Surace_Sustainability_2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Sustainability_Articolo Abatecola Surace 2020
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/264135
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact