Contrary to tandem autologous transplant (auto-auto), autologous followed by reduced intensity conditioning allogenic transplantation (auto-allo) offers graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect but with higher toxicity. Trials comparing these two strategies relied on availability of HLA-matched sibling donors for arm allocation (biological randomization) and yielded conflicting results. A pooled analysis of multiple trials with extended follow up provides an opportunity to compare these strategies. We obtained individual patient data from participants of four trials comparing auto-auto vs. auto-allo after induction therapy. There were 899 patients in auto-auto and 439 in auto-allo. Median follow up of survivors was 118.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 78.0 months in auto-auto and 98.3 months in auto-allo (HR = 0.84, P = 0.02). OS was 36.4% vs. 44.1% at 10 years (P = 0.01) for auto-auto and auto-allo, respectively. Progression-free survival was also improved in auto-allo (HR = 0.84, P = 0.004). Risk of non-relapse mortality was higher in auto-allo (10 year 8.3% vs. 19.7%, P < 0.001), while risk of disease progression was higher in auto-auto (10 year 77.2% vs. 61.6%, P < 0.001). Median post relapse survival was 41.5 months in auto-auto and 62.3 months in auto-allo (HR = 0.71, P < 0.001). This supports the existence of durable GVM effect enhancing myeloma control with subsequent therapies.

Costa, L.j., Iacobelli, S., Pasquini, M.c., Modi, R., Giaccone, L., Blade, J., et al. (2020). Long-term survival of 1338 MM patients treated with tandem autologous vs. autologous-allogeneic transplantation. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 55(9), 1810-1816 [10.1038/s41409-020-0887-4].

Long-term survival of 1338 MM patients treated with tandem autologous vs. autologous-allogeneic transplantation

Iacobelli, Simona;
2020-09-01

Abstract

Contrary to tandem autologous transplant (auto-auto), autologous followed by reduced intensity conditioning allogenic transplantation (auto-allo) offers graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect but with higher toxicity. Trials comparing these two strategies relied on availability of HLA-matched sibling donors for arm allocation (biological randomization) and yielded conflicting results. A pooled analysis of multiple trials with extended follow up provides an opportunity to compare these strategies. We obtained individual patient data from participants of four trials comparing auto-auto vs. auto-allo after induction therapy. There were 899 patients in auto-auto and 439 in auto-allo. Median follow up of survivors was 118.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 78.0 months in auto-auto and 98.3 months in auto-allo (HR = 0.84, P = 0.02). OS was 36.4% vs. 44.1% at 10 years (P = 0.01) for auto-auto and auto-allo, respectively. Progression-free survival was also improved in auto-allo (HR = 0.84, P = 0.004). Risk of non-relapse mortality was higher in auto-allo (10 year 8.3% vs. 19.7%, P < 0.001), while risk of disease progression was higher in auto-auto (10 year 77.2% vs. 61.6%, P < 0.001). Median post relapse survival was 41.5 months in auto-auto and 62.3 months in auto-allo (HR = 0.71, P < 0.001). This supports the existence of durable GVM effect enhancing myeloma control with subsequent therapies.
set-2020
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/15 - MALATTIE DEL SANGUE
Settore MED/01 - STATISTICA MEDICA
English
Costa, L.j., Iacobelli, S., Pasquini, M.c., Modi, R., Giaccone, L., Blade, J., et al. (2020). Long-term survival of 1338 MM patients treated with tandem autologous vs. autologous-allogeneic transplantation. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 55(9), 1810-1816 [10.1038/s41409-020-0887-4].
Costa, Lj; Iacobelli, S; Pasquini, Mc; Modi, R; Giaccone, L; Blade, J; Schonland, S; Evangelista, A; Perez-Simon, Ja; Hari, P; Brown, Ee; Giralt, Sa; Patriarca, F; Stadtmauer, Ea; Rosinol, L; Krishnan, Ay; Gahrton, G; Bruno, B
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Costa_metha_BMT_2020.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 1.14 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.14 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/260898
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact