The ethics of scientific research highlight crucial responsibilities and obligations concerning respect for, and protection of, humans and other living beings participating in it; the idea of a common enterprise based on commitment to truth, methodological rigour and impartiality, and the line which should not be crossed in order to prevent science from becoming a threat to human dignity or the environment. Building on principles, rules and criteria enshrined in many international documents over the last few decades, it is possible to address fundamental questions, which are still open to debate and at the crossroads of ethics and society. Ethics of scientific research continue to play a decisive role with regard to the many inequalities and asymmetries which could potentially pave the way to new forms of discrimination or even exploitation. Building a global ‘community’ of science implies fostering access to the results of research, which should not remain a responsibility (or a privilege) just for the few. If we adopt the same perspective, the concept of ‘sharing’ also needs to be broadened, addressing capacity-building and inclusion, for active participation in producing scientific and technological advancements for the good of humanity.

Semplici, S. (2019). Respect and protection, the community of researchers, and the good of humanity. In M. do Céu Patrão Neves (a cura di), Ethics, Science & Society. Challenges for BioPolitics (pp. 145-157). Lisboa : Fundação Luso-Americana para o desenvolvimento.

Respect and protection, the community of researchers, and the good of humanity

S. Semplici
2019-01-01

Abstract

The ethics of scientific research highlight crucial responsibilities and obligations concerning respect for, and protection of, humans and other living beings participating in it; the idea of a common enterprise based on commitment to truth, methodological rigour and impartiality, and the line which should not be crossed in order to prevent science from becoming a threat to human dignity or the environment. Building on principles, rules and criteria enshrined in many international documents over the last few decades, it is possible to address fundamental questions, which are still open to debate and at the crossroads of ethics and society. Ethics of scientific research continue to play a decisive role with regard to the many inequalities and asymmetries which could potentially pave the way to new forms of discrimination or even exploitation. Building a global ‘community’ of science implies fostering access to the results of research, which should not remain a responsibility (or a privilege) just for the few. If we adopt the same perspective, the concept of ‘sharing’ also needs to be broadened, addressing capacity-building and inclusion, for active participation in producing scientific and technological advancements for the good of humanity.
2019
Settore M-FIL/03 - FILOSOFIA MORALE
English
Rilevanza internazionale
Capitolo o saggio
ethics of research; inequality; minors; openness; sharing
Semplici, S. (2019). Respect and protection, the community of researchers, and the good of humanity. In M. do Céu Patrão Neves (a cura di), Ethics, Science & Society. Challenges for BioPolitics (pp. 145-157). Lisboa : Fundação Luso-Americana para o desenvolvimento.
Semplici, S
Contributo in libro
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/254000
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact