The varia lectio τἀλαθέα in Theocr. 15. 81 (Antinoe papyrus) might be to prefer to the vulgate τἀκριβέα as expression of popular aesthetic judgement. Arguments against the interpretation of the ‘ecphrastic’ passages of Theocrit. XV and Herodas’ Fourth Mimiamb as representative of the contemporary ‘professional’ art criticism.
Dettori, E. (2011). Una varia lectio trascurata a Theocr. 15. 81 (talathea vs takribea). SEMINARI ROMANI DI CULTURA GRECA, 12(2), 201-210.
Una varia lectio trascurata a Theocr. 15. 81 (talathea vs takribea)
DETTORI, EMANUELE
2011-10-01
Abstract
The varia lectio τἀλαθέα in Theocr. 15. 81 (Antinoe papyrus) might be to prefer to the vulgate τἀκριβέα as expression of popular aesthetic judgement. Arguments against the interpretation of the ‘ecphrastic’ passages of Theocrit. XV and Herodas’ Fourth Mimiamb as representative of the contemporary ‘professional’ art criticism.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
77. Una varia lectio trascurata a Theocr. 15. 81 (τἀλαθέα vs τἀκριβέα).pdf
Open Access dal 02/08/2012
Dimensione
332.92 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
332.92 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
