Polychaetes inhabit all the marine benthic communities and play a significant role in the degradation of calcareous substrates in marine environment. Colonization dynamics of encrusting epibenthos and polychaete assemblages on limestone experimental substrates were studied over a 3-year period in a Marine Protected Area: the Underwater Archaeological Park of Baiae (central Tyrrhenian Sea). Competitive and encrusting organisms replaced the pioneer species, dominating the epilithic community, and increasing the available surface. Polychaetes increased in species number over time. Several boring specimens of the species Polydora ciliata and Dodecaceria concharum were responsible for the bioerosion of the calcareous material. The former species characterized the early stage of the succession, whereas the latter settled during the late stages, together with the nestler species Lysidice unicornis, whose boring activity has been hypothesized. Four different surface trace morphologies attributable to boring polychaetes are here reported and described. The number of the polychaete boring traces increased according to the surface covered by ascidians, barnacles, and bryozoans. The present work provides evidence regarding positive interactions between encrusting epibenthic organisms and endolithic worms.

Casoli, E., Ricci, S., Antonelli, F., Sacco, P., C, ., Ardizzone, G., et al. (2019). Colonization dynamic on experimental limestone substrata: the role of encrusting epilithics favouring boring polychaetes. HYDROBIOLOGIA, 842(1), 101-112 [10.1007/s10750-019-04028-9].

Colonization dynamic on experimental limestone substrata: the role of encrusting epilithics favouring boring polychaetes

Gravina, MF
2019-07-29

Abstract

Polychaetes inhabit all the marine benthic communities and play a significant role in the degradation of calcareous substrates in marine environment. Colonization dynamics of encrusting epibenthos and polychaete assemblages on limestone experimental substrates were studied over a 3-year period in a Marine Protected Area: the Underwater Archaeological Park of Baiae (central Tyrrhenian Sea). Competitive and encrusting organisms replaced the pioneer species, dominating the epilithic community, and increasing the available surface. Polychaetes increased in species number over time. Several boring specimens of the species Polydora ciliata and Dodecaceria concharum were responsible for the bioerosion of the calcareous material. The former species characterized the early stage of the succession, whereas the latter settled during the late stages, together with the nestler species Lysidice unicornis, whose boring activity has been hypothesized. Four different surface trace morphologies attributable to boring polychaetes are here reported and described. The number of the polychaete boring traces increased according to the surface covered by ascidians, barnacles, and bryozoans. The present work provides evidence regarding positive interactions between encrusting epibenthic organisms and endolithic worms.
29-lug-2019
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore BIO/07 - ECOLOGIA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Boring polychaetes; Epilithic community; Encrusting epibenthos; Polydora ciliata; Dodecaceria concharum; Mediterranean Sea
Casoli, E., Ricci, S., Antonelli, F., Sacco, P., C, ., Ardizzone, G., et al. (2019). Colonization dynamic on experimental limestone substrata: the role of encrusting epilithics favouring boring polychaetes. HYDROBIOLOGIA, 842(1), 101-112 [10.1007/s10750-019-04028-9].
Casoli, E; Ricci, S; Antonelli, F; Sacco, P; C, ; Ardizzone, G; Gravina, M
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gravina 2019 Hydrobiologia.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 956.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
956.07 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/252361
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact