Background The increased use of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) to investigate cognitive dysfunctions in schizophrenia fostered interest in its sensitivity in the context of family studies. As various measures of the same cognitive domains may have different power to distinguish between unaffected relatives of patients and controls, the relative sensitivity of MCCB tests for relative-control differences has to be established. We compared MCCB scores of 852 outpatients with schizophrenia (SCZ) with those of 342 unaffected relatives (REL) and a normative Italian sample of 774 healthy subjects (HCS). We examined familial aggregation of cognitive impairment by investigating within-family prediction of MCCB scores based on probands' scores.Methods Multivariate analysis of variance was used to analyze group differences in adjusted MCCB scores. Weighted least-squares analysis was used to investigate whether probands' MCCB scores predicted REL neurocognitive performance.Results SCZ were significantly impaired on all MCCB domains. REL had intermediate scores between SCZ and HCS, showing a similar pattern of impairment, except for social cognition. Proband's scores significantly predicted REL MCCB scores on all domains except for visual learning.Conclusions In a large sample of stable patients with schizophrenia, living in the community, and in their unaffected relatives, MCCB demonstrated sensitivity to cognitive deficits in both groups. Our findings of significant within-family prediction of MCCB scores might reflect disease-related genetic or environmental factors.

Mucci, A., Galderisi, S., Green, M.f., Nuechterlein, K., Rucci, P., Gibertoni, D., et al. (2018). Familial aggregation of MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery scores in a large sample of outpatients with schizophrenia and their unaffected relatives. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 48(8), 1359-1366 [10.1017/S0033291717002902].

Familial aggregation of MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery scores in a large sample of outpatients with schizophrenia and their unaffected relatives

Di Lorenzo G.;Rossi R.;Niolu C.;Ribolsi M.;Siracusano A.;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Background The increased use of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) to investigate cognitive dysfunctions in schizophrenia fostered interest in its sensitivity in the context of family studies. As various measures of the same cognitive domains may have different power to distinguish between unaffected relatives of patients and controls, the relative sensitivity of MCCB tests for relative-control differences has to be established. We compared MCCB scores of 852 outpatients with schizophrenia (SCZ) with those of 342 unaffected relatives (REL) and a normative Italian sample of 774 healthy subjects (HCS). We examined familial aggregation of cognitive impairment by investigating within-family prediction of MCCB scores based on probands' scores.Methods Multivariate analysis of variance was used to analyze group differences in adjusted MCCB scores. Weighted least-squares analysis was used to investigate whether probands' MCCB scores predicted REL neurocognitive performance.Results SCZ were significantly impaired on all MCCB domains. REL had intermediate scores between SCZ and HCS, showing a similar pattern of impairment, except for social cognition. Proband's scores significantly predicted REL MCCB scores on all domains except for visual learning.Conclusions In a large sample of stable patients with schizophrenia, living in the community, and in their unaffected relatives, MCCB demonstrated sensitivity to cognitive deficits in both groups. Our findings of significant within-family prediction of MCCB scores might reflect disease-related genetic or environmental factors.
2018
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/25 - PSICHIATRIA
English
Attention
MCCB Italian standardization
reasoning and problem solving
social cognition
verbal learning
working memory
Adult
Aged
Cognition
Cognitive Dysfunction
Consensus
Family
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Outpatients
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychometrics
Schizophrenia
Schizophrenic Psychology
Mucci, A., Galderisi, S., Green, M.f., Nuechterlein, K., Rucci, P., Gibertoni, D., et al. (2018). Familial aggregation of MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery scores in a large sample of outpatients with schizophrenia and their unaffected relatives. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 48(8), 1359-1366 [10.1017/S0033291717002902].
Mucci, A; Galderisi, S; Green, Mf; Nuechterlein, K; Rucci, P; Gibertoni, D; Rossi, A; Rocca, P; Bertolino, A; Bucci, P; Hellemann, G; Spisto, M; Palumbo, D; Aguglia, E; Amodeo, G; Amore, M; Bellomo, A; Brugnoli, R; Carpiniello, B; Dell'Osso, L; Di Fabio, F; Di Giannantonio, M; Di Lorenzo, G; Marchesi, C; Monteleone, P; Montemagni, C; Oldani, L; Romano, R; Roncone, R; Stratta, P; Tenconi, E; Vita, A; Zeppegno, P; Maj, M; Piegari, G; Vignapiano, A; Caputo, F; Plescia, G; Montefusco, V; Mancini, M; Attrotto, Mt; Paladini, V; Atti, Ar; Barlati, S; Galluzzo, A; Mussoni, C; Pinna, F; Sanna, L; Primavera, D; Signorelli, Ms; Minutolo, G; Cannavo, D; Acciavatti, T; Santacroce, R; Corbo, M; Altamura, M; La Montagna, M; Carnevale, R; Pizziconi, G; Rossi, R; Santarelli, V; Giusti, L; Malavolta, M; Salza, A; Murri, Mb; Calcagno, P; Bugliani, M; Serati, M; Orsenigo, G; Gramaglia, C; Gattoni, E; Cattaneo, C; Campagnola, N; Ferronato, L; Piovan, C; Tonna, M; Bettini, E; Ossola, P; Gesi, C; Landi, P; Rutigliano, G; Biondi, M; Girardi, P; Buzzanca, A; Zocconali, M; Comparelli, A; Mancinelli, I; Niolu, C; Ribolsi, M; Siracusano, A; Corrivetti, G; Bartoli, L; Diasco, F; Bolognesi, S; Goracci, A; Fagiolini, A; Bellino, S; Cardillo, S; Bracale, N
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/250408
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 32
social impact