Objectives To validate a psychometric instrument, the Masturbation Erection Index (MEI) able to evaluate erectile function (EF) during masturbation. In fact, although the evaluation of EF during masturbation is pivotal in evaluating erectile dysfunction (ED), to date no specific psychometric tools have been developed to measure it both in the routine clinical practice and in the experimental setting. Patients and Methods Of 560 men attending our andrological outpatient clinic for the first time, 99 (17.7%) had ED. As a control group, we enrolled 102 sexually healthy men. All the men were requested to complete both the six-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) and the MEI. The MEI was used together with a standardised tool, the Erection Hardness Score (EHS). The MEI was validated in terms of content validity. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Internal consistency was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha. The comparability between the MEI and IIEF-6 in measuring EF was tested by Bland-Altman analysis. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between the two questionnaires was also determined. Results Internal consistency of the MEI was >0.93. Test-retest reliability was 0.982 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.975-0.987). Bland-Altman analysis showed a good level of agreement between the IIEF-6 and MEI in the whole ED population, with stronger agreement in the organic-ED subpopulation. The estimated area under the curve of the MEI was 0.983 (P < 0.001; 95% CI 0.954-0.996), with a score of <= 27 as the optimal threshold to discriminate between the presence and absence of ED during self-induced masturbation. The CCC, Pearson rho and bias correction factor (Cb) were 0.951 (95% CI 0.936-0.962), 0.968, and 0.982, respectively. Conclusion The MEI showed good internal consistency and a good level of agreement with the IIEF-6. Hence, the MEI fulfills the major psychometric requirements for measuring EF during masturbation.

Limoncin, E., Gravina, G.l., Lotti, F., Maseroli, E., Ciocca, G., Corona, G., et al. (2018). The Masturbation Erection Index (MEI): validation of a new psychometric tool, derived from the six-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) and from the Erection Hardness Score (EHS), for measuring erectile function during masturbation. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 123(3), 530-537 [10.1111/bju.14560].

The Masturbation Erection Index (MEI): validation of a new psychometric tool, derived from the six-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) and from the Erection Hardness Score (EHS), for measuring erectile function during masturbation

Jannini E. A.
2018-10-23

Abstract

Objectives To validate a psychometric instrument, the Masturbation Erection Index (MEI) able to evaluate erectile function (EF) during masturbation. In fact, although the evaluation of EF during masturbation is pivotal in evaluating erectile dysfunction (ED), to date no specific psychometric tools have been developed to measure it both in the routine clinical practice and in the experimental setting. Patients and Methods Of 560 men attending our andrological outpatient clinic for the first time, 99 (17.7%) had ED. As a control group, we enrolled 102 sexually healthy men. All the men were requested to complete both the six-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) and the MEI. The MEI was used together with a standardised tool, the Erection Hardness Score (EHS). The MEI was validated in terms of content validity. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Internal consistency was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha. The comparability between the MEI and IIEF-6 in measuring EF was tested by Bland-Altman analysis. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between the two questionnaires was also determined. Results Internal consistency of the MEI was >0.93. Test-retest reliability was 0.982 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.975-0.987). Bland-Altman analysis showed a good level of agreement between the IIEF-6 and MEI in the whole ED population, with stronger agreement in the organic-ED subpopulation. The estimated area under the curve of the MEI was 0.983 (P < 0.001; 95% CI 0.954-0.996), with a score of <= 27 as the optimal threshold to discriminate between the presence and absence of ED during self-induced masturbation. The CCC, Pearson rho and bias correction factor (Cb) were 0.951 (95% CI 0.936-0.962), 0.968, and 0.982, respectively. Conclusion The MEI showed good internal consistency and a good level of agreement with the IIEF-6. Hence, the MEI fulfills the major psychometric requirements for measuring EF during masturbation.
23-ott-2018
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/13 - ENDOCRINOLOGIA
English
#Andrology; Erection Hardness Score; IIEF-6; erectile function; masturbation; Erectile Dysfunction; Hardness; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Penile Erection; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results; Surveys and Questionnaires; Healthy Volunteers; Masturbation
Limoncin, E., Gravina, G.l., Lotti, F., Maseroli, E., Ciocca, G., Corona, G., et al. (2018). The Masturbation Erection Index (MEI): validation of a new psychometric tool, derived from the six-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) and from the Erection Hardness Score (EHS), for measuring erectile function during masturbation. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 123(3), 530-537 [10.1111/bju.14560].
Limoncin, E; Gravina, Gl; Lotti, F; Maseroli, E; Ciocca, G; Corona, G; Maggi, M; Reisman, Y; Balercia, G; Lenzi, A; Jannini, Ea
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BJUi masturbometer.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 1.15 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.15 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/246349
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact