Introduction. The placement of ring or band around the gastric tube might prevent the dilation after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). We describe the first randomized study comparing LSG and Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy (LBSG). Material and Method. Fifty obese patients were enrolled in the study between January 2014 and January 2015. We analysed differences in operative time, complication rate, mortality, and BMI between the two groups over a period of 12 months. Results. Twenty-five patients received LSG (group A) and 25 LBSG (group B). The mean preoperative BMI was 47.3 +/- 6.58 kg/m(2) and 44.95 +/- 5.85 kg/m(2), respectively, in the two groups. There was no statistical relevant difference in operative time. No intraoperative complications occurred. Mean BMI registered after 3, 6, and 12 months in groups A and B, respectively, were 37.86 +/- 5.72 kg/m(2) and 37.58 +/- 6.21 kg/m(2) (p = 0.869), 33.64 +/- 6.08 kg/m(2) and 32.03 +/- 5.24 kg/m(2) (p = 0.325), and 29.72 +/- 4.40 kg/m(2) and 27.42 +/- 4.47 kg/m(2) (p = 0.186); no statistical relevant difference was registered between the two groups. Conclusion. LBSG is a safe and feasible procedure. The time required for the device positioning did not influence significantly the surgical time. The results of bodyweight loss did not document any statistically significant differences among the two groups, even though LBSG group showed a mean BMI slightly lower than that of the control group.

Tognoni, V., Benavoli, D., Bianciardi, E., Perrone, F., Ippoliti, S., Gaspari, A., et al. (2016). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic banded sleeve gastrectomy: First prospective pilot randomized study. GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016(6419603), 1-5 [10.1155/2016/6419603].

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic banded sleeve gastrectomy: First prospective pilot randomized study

Tognoni V.;Bianciardi E.;Perrone F.;Ippoliti S.;Gentileschi P.
2016-01-01

Abstract

Introduction. The placement of ring or band around the gastric tube might prevent the dilation after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). We describe the first randomized study comparing LSG and Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy (LBSG). Material and Method. Fifty obese patients were enrolled in the study between January 2014 and January 2015. We analysed differences in operative time, complication rate, mortality, and BMI between the two groups over a period of 12 months. Results. Twenty-five patients received LSG (group A) and 25 LBSG (group B). The mean preoperative BMI was 47.3 +/- 6.58 kg/m(2) and 44.95 +/- 5.85 kg/m(2), respectively, in the two groups. There was no statistical relevant difference in operative time. No intraoperative complications occurred. Mean BMI registered after 3, 6, and 12 months in groups A and B, respectively, were 37.86 +/- 5.72 kg/m(2) and 37.58 +/- 6.21 kg/m(2) (p = 0.869), 33.64 +/- 6.08 kg/m(2) and 32.03 +/- 5.24 kg/m(2) (p = 0.325), and 29.72 +/- 4.40 kg/m(2) and 27.42 +/- 4.47 kg/m(2) (p = 0.186); no statistical relevant difference was registered between the two groups. Conclusion. LBSG is a safe and feasible procedure. The time required for the device positioning did not influence significantly the surgical time. The results of bodyweight loss did not document any statistically significant differences among the two groups, even though LBSG group showed a mean BMI slightly lower than that of the control group.
2016
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/18 - CHIRURGIA GENERALE
English
Tognoni, V., Benavoli, D., Bianciardi, E., Perrone, F., Ippoliti, S., Gaspari, A., et al. (2016). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic banded sleeve gastrectomy: First prospective pilot randomized study. GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016(6419603), 1-5 [10.1155/2016/6419603].
Tognoni, V; Benavoli, D; Bianciardi, E; Perrone, F; Ippoliti, S; Gaspari, A; Gentileschi, P
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 1.25 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.25 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/243177
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact