This wide-ranging, authoritative collection, edited by Eric S. Nelson, has the format of a Companion. It isn't labeled such since Wilhelm Dilthey has not yet attained the status of a canonized philosopher, perhaps due to the dearth of English translations of his writings, and even more to their intricacy. There is now, however, the landmark six-volume translation of Dilthey's major work, edited by Rudolf Makkreel and Frithjof Rodi (Princeton University Press, 1989-2019). Given the translation, this collection may well turn attention to Dilthey's work. This may happen soon given the emerging perception that philosophy is about both research and innovation, for Dilthey was indeed the author of quite well constructed and well pursued innovative philosophical strategies. Although it dates back to the turn of the twentieth century, Dilthey's work remains enormously relevant to current debates about science policy, art and literature, the biographical and autobiographical self, knowledge, language, science, culture, history, society, psychology, and the embodied self.

Pozzo, R. (2020). Review of Eric S. Nelson, ed. Interpreting Dilthey: Critical Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019). NOTRE DAME PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEWS, https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/interpreting-dilthey-critical-essays/.

Review of Eric S. Nelson, ed. Interpreting Dilthey: Critical Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019)

Pozzo, Riccardo
2020-02-14

Abstract

This wide-ranging, authoritative collection, edited by Eric S. Nelson, has the format of a Companion. It isn't labeled such since Wilhelm Dilthey has not yet attained the status of a canonized philosopher, perhaps due to the dearth of English translations of his writings, and even more to their intricacy. There is now, however, the landmark six-volume translation of Dilthey's major work, edited by Rudolf Makkreel and Frithjof Rodi (Princeton University Press, 1989-2019). Given the translation, this collection may well turn attention to Dilthey's work. This may happen soon given the emerging perception that philosophy is about both research and innovation, for Dilthey was indeed the author of quite well constructed and well pursued innovative philosophical strategies. Although it dates back to the turn of the twentieth century, Dilthey's work remains enormously relevant to current debates about science policy, art and literature, the biographical and autobiographical self, knowledge, language, science, culture, history, society, psychology, and the embodied self.
14-feb-2020
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Recensione
Comitato scientifico
Settore M-FIL/06 - STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA
English
Wilhelm Dilthey, innovation, human sciences
https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/interpreting-dilthey-critical-essays/
Pozzo, R. (2020). Review of Eric S. Nelson, ed. Interpreting Dilthey: Critical Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019). NOTRE DAME PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEWS, https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/interpreting-dilthey-critical-essays/.
Pozzo, R
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Interpreting Dilthey: Critical Essays :: Reviews :: Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews :: University o.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Interpreting Dilthey
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 280.6 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
280.6 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/240889
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact