The investigation of various aspects of tokamak physics is performed with a combination of experiments carried out in different machines, to improve the statistical basis of the results and to cover a sufficient wide region of the operational space. Therefore, in the last decades, various multimachine databases have been built to address general and specific physical questions, particularly related to the extrapolation of present results to the next generation of devices. In this paper, a methodology of analysis is presented, to assess whether a multimachine data set is sufficiently coherent to really substantiate the conclusions, which are expected to be derived from it. A series of statistical and information theoretical tools have been refined to address the consistency of the data provided by the different devices. The developed techniques allow determination of whether it is reasonable to expect that the physics is the same in the various devices and/or that the entries do not present unacceptable bias. To exemplify the potential of the proposed approach, a systematic analysis of the ITPA database of the confinement time has been performed, using both dimensional and dimensionless quantities. The results obtained strongly suggest that better care should be taken in ensuring the coherence of data obtained from different experiments on different devices.

Murari, A., Lungaroni, M., Gelfusa, M. (2020). Testing the consistency of multimachine databases for physical studies of regression. NUCLEAR FUSION, 60(1), 015001 [10.1088/1741-4326/ab4285].

Testing the consistency of multimachine databases for physical studies of regression

Lungaroni M.;Gelfusa M.
2020-01-01

Abstract

The investigation of various aspects of tokamak physics is performed with a combination of experiments carried out in different machines, to improve the statistical basis of the results and to cover a sufficient wide region of the operational space. Therefore, in the last decades, various multimachine databases have been built to address general and specific physical questions, particularly related to the extrapolation of present results to the next generation of devices. In this paper, a methodology of analysis is presented, to assess whether a multimachine data set is sufficiently coherent to really substantiate the conclusions, which are expected to be derived from it. A series of statistical and information theoretical tools have been refined to address the consistency of the data provided by the different devices. The developed techniques allow determination of whether it is reasonable to expect that the physics is the same in the various devices and/or that the entries do not present unacceptable bias. To exemplify the potential of the proposed approach, a systematic analysis of the ITPA database of the confinement time has been performed, using both dimensional and dimensionless quantities. The results obtained strongly suggest that better care should be taken in ensuring the coherence of data obtained from different experiments on different devices.
2020
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore ING-IND/18 - FISICA DEI REATTORI NUCLEARI
English
step ladder approach; scaling laws; linear correlations; non-linear correlations; mutual information; Pearson correlation coefficient; multimachine databases
Murari, A., Lungaroni, M., Gelfusa, M. (2020). Testing the consistency of multimachine databases for physical studies of regression. NUCLEAR FUSION, 60(1), 015001 [10.1088/1741-4326/ab4285].
Murari, A; Lungaroni, M; Gelfusa, M
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Murari_2020_Nucl._Fusion_60_015001.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 3.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.51 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/240260
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact