Objectives. The aim of this pilot split-mouth controlled human study is to evaluate histologic and histomorphometric results of a highly purified xenogenic grafting material in maxillary sinus floor augmentation after six months of follow-up. Methods. This pilot split-mouth study was conducted on 11 patients, 7 females and 4 males (mean age 53 +/- 7.9 years; range 41-68 years), who underwent maxillary sinus floor augmentation. The following biomaterials were used: Laddec: a highly purified bovine xenograft, that was the test material; and Bio-oss a natural bone mineral, that was the control material. Six patients (4 females, 2 males) were treated with unilateral major maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-oss, and five patients (3 females, 2 males) were subjected to bilateral major maxillary sinus floor augmentation, with Bio-oss in one side and Laddec in the other side. Consequently, the test group (Laddec) included 5 samples, while the control group (Biooss) included 11 samples. Results. For the Laddec, the newly formed bone was 36% ± 2.3; the intertrabecular spaces were 34% ± 1.6, and the residual material was 30% ± 1.4. For the Bio-Oss, the newly formed bone was 38% ± 1.6; the intertrabecular spaces were 26% ± 1.6, whereas the residual material was 36% ± 3.1. Conclusions. Both the xenoimplants obtained a good bone regeneration with a satisfying quantity of newly formed bone and reduced quantity of fibrous bone. The Laddec showed a better absorbability compared with Bio-Oss, whose residual percentage is greater for the same elapsed time.

Mummolo, S., Nota, A., Marchetti, E., Capuano, S., Tecco, S., Marzo, G., et al. (2018). Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials. A pilot split-mouth human study. ORAL & IMPLANTOLOGY, 11(4), 249-256.

Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials. A pilot split-mouth human study

Nota A.;Campanella V.
2018-01-01

Abstract

Objectives. The aim of this pilot split-mouth controlled human study is to evaluate histologic and histomorphometric results of a highly purified xenogenic grafting material in maxillary sinus floor augmentation after six months of follow-up. Methods. This pilot split-mouth study was conducted on 11 patients, 7 females and 4 males (mean age 53 +/- 7.9 years; range 41-68 years), who underwent maxillary sinus floor augmentation. The following biomaterials were used: Laddec: a highly purified bovine xenograft, that was the test material; and Bio-oss a natural bone mineral, that was the control material. Six patients (4 females, 2 males) were treated with unilateral major maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-oss, and five patients (3 females, 2 males) were subjected to bilateral major maxillary sinus floor augmentation, with Bio-oss in one side and Laddec in the other side. Consequently, the test group (Laddec) included 5 samples, while the control group (Biooss) included 11 samples. Results. For the Laddec, the newly formed bone was 36% ± 2.3; the intertrabecular spaces were 34% ± 1.6, and the residual material was 30% ± 1.4. For the Bio-Oss, the newly formed bone was 38% ± 1.6; the intertrabecular spaces were 26% ± 1.6, whereas the residual material was 36% ± 3.1. Conclusions. Both the xenoimplants obtained a good bone regeneration with a satisfying quantity of newly formed bone and reduced quantity of fibrous bone. The Laddec showed a better absorbability compared with Bio-Oss, whose residual percentage is greater for the same elapsed time.
2018
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/28 - MALATTIE ODONTOSTOMATOLOGICHE
English
sinus floor augmentation; bone grafting; biomaterials; bone regeneration; maxillary sinus; histology
Mummolo, S., Nota, A., Marchetti, E., Capuano, S., Tecco, S., Marzo, G., et al. (2018). Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials. A pilot split-mouth human study. ORAL & IMPLANTOLOGY, 11(4), 249-256.
Mummolo, S; Nota, A; Marchetti, E; Capuano, S; Tecco, S; Marzo, G; Campanella, V
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2018Mummolo_2018.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 800.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
800.59 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/238646
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact