Background: Pulpotomy is the surgical removal of the entire coronal pulp with preservation of the radicular pulp vitality. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of pulpotomy of primary molars using two materials, biodentine and calcium hydroxide.Methods: Records of 400 primary molars in 360 paediatric participants (mean age: 7.5 +/- 1.6 years, ranging from 5 to 9 years) with dental caries who required pulp therapy were included in this study. Biodentine was used on 200 teeth, and calcium hydroxide (CH) was used on another 200 teeth, as a pulpotomy material. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed after 9 and 18 months. Statistical analysis was evaluated with the chi-squared test, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05.Results: The treatment success with CH was 85.5% after 9 months and 79.5% after 18 months, while the success rate of biodentine was 94% after 9 months and 89.5% after 18 months. The statistical analysis with the Chi-squared test showed that the clinical and radiographic success rate with biodentine was significantly higher than CH (p < 0.05).Conclusions: Biodentine exhibited a higher clinical and radiographic success rate compared to CH. However, besides the clinical results, biodentine has some disadvantages, such as higher costs, compared to CH.

Caruso, S., Dinoi, T., Marzo, G., Campanella, V., Giuca, M.r., Gatto, R., et al. (2018). Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: A retrospective study. BMC ORAL HEALTH, 18(1), 54-60 [10.1186/s12903-018-0522-6].

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: A retrospective study

Campanella V.;Gatto R.;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Background: Pulpotomy is the surgical removal of the entire coronal pulp with preservation of the radicular pulp vitality. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of pulpotomy of primary molars using two materials, biodentine and calcium hydroxide.Methods: Records of 400 primary molars in 360 paediatric participants (mean age: 7.5 +/- 1.6 years, ranging from 5 to 9 years) with dental caries who required pulp therapy were included in this study. Biodentine was used on 200 teeth, and calcium hydroxide (CH) was used on another 200 teeth, as a pulpotomy material. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed after 9 and 18 months. Statistical analysis was evaluated with the chi-squared test, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05.Results: The treatment success with CH was 85.5% after 9 months and 79.5% after 18 months, while the success rate of biodentine was 94% after 9 months and 89.5% after 18 months. The statistical analysis with the Chi-squared test showed that the clinical and radiographic success rate with biodentine was significantly higher than CH (p < 0.05).Conclusions: Biodentine exhibited a higher clinical and radiographic success rate compared to CH. However, besides the clinical results, biodentine has some disadvantages, such as higher costs, compared to CH.
2018
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/28 - MALATTIE ODONTOSTOMATOLOGICHE
English
Pulpotomy; Primary teeth; Biodentine; Calcium hydroxide
Caruso, S., Dinoi, T., Marzo, G., Campanella, V., Giuca, M.r., Gatto, R., et al. (2018). Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: A retrospective study. BMC ORAL HEALTH, 18(1), 54-60 [10.1186/s12903-018-0522-6].
Caruso, S; Dinoi, T; Marzo, G; Campanella, V; Giuca, Mr; Gatto, R; Pasini, M
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2018caruso2018.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 381.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
381.9 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/238542
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact