In the GIMEMA LAL 0904 protocol, adult Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients were treated with chemotherapy for induction and consolidation, followed by maintenance with imatinib. The protocol was subsequently amended and imatinib was incorporated in the induction and post-remission phase together with chemotherapy. Due to the toxicity of this combined approach, the protocol was further amended to a sequential scheme based on imatinib plus steroids as induction, followed by consolidation with chemotherapy plus imatinib and, when applicable, by a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Fifty-one patients (median age 45.9 years) were enrolled in the final sequential protocol. At the end of induction (day +50), 96% of evaluable patients (n=49) achieved a complete hematologic remission; after consolidation, all were in complete hematologic remission. No deaths in induction were recorded. Overall survival and disease-free survival at 60 months are 48.8% and 45.8%, respectively. At day +50 (end of imatinib induction), a more than 1.3 log-reduction of BCR-ABL1 levels was associated with a significantly longer disease-free survival (55.6%, 95% CI: 39.0-79.3 vs. 20%, 95% CI: 5.8-69.1; P=0.03), overall survival (59.1%, 95% CI: 42.3-82.6 vs. 20%, 95% CI: 5.8-69.1; P=0.02) and lower incidence of relapse (20.5%, 95% CI: 7.2-38.6 vs. 60.0%, 95% CI: 21.6-84.3; P=0.01). Mean BCR-ABL1 levels remained significantly higher in patients who subsequently relapsed. Finally, BCR-ABL1(p190) patients showed a significantly faster molecular response than BCR-ABL1(p210) patients (P=0.023). Though the study was not powered to evaluate the role of allogeneic stem cell transplant, allografting positively impacted on both overall and disease-free survival. In conclusion, a sequential approach with imatinib alone in induction, consolidated by chemotherapy plus imatinib followed by a stem cell transplant is a feasible, well-tolerated and effective strategy for adult Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, leading to the best long-term survival rates so far reported. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 00458848).

Chiaretti, S., Vitale, A., Vignetti, M., Piciocchi, A., Fazi, P., Elia, L., et al. (2016). A sequential approach with imatinib, chemotherapy and transplant for adult Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Final results of the GIMEMA LAL 0904 study. HAEMATOLOGICA, 101(12), 1544-1552 [10.3324/haematol.2016.144535].

A sequential approach with imatinib, chemotherapy and transplant for adult Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Final results of the GIMEMA LAL 0904 study

De Fabritiis P.
;
2016-01-01

Abstract

In the GIMEMA LAL 0904 protocol, adult Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients were treated with chemotherapy for induction and consolidation, followed by maintenance with imatinib. The protocol was subsequently amended and imatinib was incorporated in the induction and post-remission phase together with chemotherapy. Due to the toxicity of this combined approach, the protocol was further amended to a sequential scheme based on imatinib plus steroids as induction, followed by consolidation with chemotherapy plus imatinib and, when applicable, by a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Fifty-one patients (median age 45.9 years) were enrolled in the final sequential protocol. At the end of induction (day +50), 96% of evaluable patients (n=49) achieved a complete hematologic remission; after consolidation, all were in complete hematologic remission. No deaths in induction were recorded. Overall survival and disease-free survival at 60 months are 48.8% and 45.8%, respectively. At day +50 (end of imatinib induction), a more than 1.3 log-reduction of BCR-ABL1 levels was associated with a significantly longer disease-free survival (55.6%, 95% CI: 39.0-79.3 vs. 20%, 95% CI: 5.8-69.1; P=0.03), overall survival (59.1%, 95% CI: 42.3-82.6 vs. 20%, 95% CI: 5.8-69.1; P=0.02) and lower incidence of relapse (20.5%, 95% CI: 7.2-38.6 vs. 60.0%, 95% CI: 21.6-84.3; P=0.01). Mean BCR-ABL1 levels remained significantly higher in patients who subsequently relapsed. Finally, BCR-ABL1(p190) patients showed a significantly faster molecular response than BCR-ABL1(p210) patients (P=0.023). Though the study was not powered to evaluate the role of allogeneic stem cell transplant, allografting positively impacted on both overall and disease-free survival. In conclusion, a sequential approach with imatinib alone in induction, consolidated by chemotherapy plus imatinib followed by a stem cell transplant is a feasible, well-tolerated and effective strategy for adult Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, leading to the best long-term survival rates so far reported. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 00458848).
2016
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/01 - STATISTICA MEDICA
English
Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl; Humans; Imatinib Mesylate; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm, Residual; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Recurrence; Remission Induction; Retreatment; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Chiaretti, S., Vitale, A., Vignetti, M., Piciocchi, A., Fazi, P., Elia, L., et al. (2016). A sequential approach with imatinib, chemotherapy and transplant for adult Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Final results of the GIMEMA LAL 0904 study. HAEMATOLOGICA, 101(12), 1544-1552 [10.3324/haematol.2016.144535].
Chiaretti, S; Vitale, A; Vignetti, M; Piciocchi, A; Fazi, P; Elia, L; Falini, B; Ronco, F; Ferrara, F; De Fabritiis, P; Luppi, M; La Nasa, G; Tedeschi, A; Califano, C; Fanin, R; Dore, F; Mandelli, F; Meloni, G; Foa, R
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/233175
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 28
  • Scopus 65
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 59
social impact