BACKGROUND: The chimney technique has been developed for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms. We analyzed the midterm to long-term outcomes of this approach from a single-center experience.METHODS: From October 2008 to July 2016, 58 patients underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using the chimney technique. Indications for treatment were thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) (N.=11), thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) (N.=2), pararenal aortic aneurysm (PAAA) (N.=15), aortoiliac/isolated hypogastric artery aneurysm (N.=25), type I endoleak after previous TEVAR/EVAR (N.=4), proximal pseudoaneurysm after AAA open repair (N.=1). Elective (82.8%) and emergent (17.2%) procedures were included.RESULTS: The immediate technical success was 100%. Single, double and triple chimneys were performed in 46, 10, and two patients, respectively. Overall, 61 target vessels (three left common carotid arteries, eight left subclavian arteries, three celiac trunks, three superior mesenteric arteries, 19 renal arteries and 25 hypogastric arteries) were involved. Postoperative mortality was 0. No neurologic complications were registered. Primary patency rate of the chimney stent/stent graft was 98.3%. Low-flow type I endoleak was observed in four patients (6.9%). Postoperative chimney graft re-intervention rate was 1.7%. The median follow-up was 32 +/- 20 months (range 3-96 months). Overall estimated survival at 12, 50, and 80 months was 100%, 89% and 44%, respectively. Estimated freedom from endoleak at 1, 12, 24, and 36 months was 96.5%, 95%, 95%, and 93%, respectively. One hypogastric artery stent-graft occluded at the 3rd month of follow-up. No reintervention was performed.CONLUSIONS: Our experience with the chimney technique for aortic aneurysms from the aortic arch to the iliac axis shows promising and durable mid- and long-term results. Endograft oversizing, associated with the chimney graft diameter and length choice remain fundamental to reduce the risk of the most frequent procedure complications: type I endoleak and CG occlusion. The wider use of this technique should be justified in patients considered at high risk for open repair and/or not suitable for the custom-made branched/fenestrated endografts.

Fadda, G.f., Marino, M., Kasemi, H., Di Angelo, C.l., Dionisi, C.p., Cammalleri, V., et al. (2019). Aortic aneurysm endovascular treatment with the parallel graft technique from the aortic arch to the iliac axis. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 60(5), 589-598 [10.23736/S0021-9509.17.09899-8].

Aortic aneurysm endovascular treatment with the parallel graft technique from the aortic arch to the iliac axis

Cammalleri V.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The chimney technique has been developed for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms. We analyzed the midterm to long-term outcomes of this approach from a single-center experience.METHODS: From October 2008 to July 2016, 58 patients underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using the chimney technique. Indications for treatment were thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) (N.=11), thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) (N.=2), pararenal aortic aneurysm (PAAA) (N.=15), aortoiliac/isolated hypogastric artery aneurysm (N.=25), type I endoleak after previous TEVAR/EVAR (N.=4), proximal pseudoaneurysm after AAA open repair (N.=1). Elective (82.8%) and emergent (17.2%) procedures were included.RESULTS: The immediate technical success was 100%. Single, double and triple chimneys were performed in 46, 10, and two patients, respectively. Overall, 61 target vessels (three left common carotid arteries, eight left subclavian arteries, three celiac trunks, three superior mesenteric arteries, 19 renal arteries and 25 hypogastric arteries) were involved. Postoperative mortality was 0. No neurologic complications were registered. Primary patency rate of the chimney stent/stent graft was 98.3%. Low-flow type I endoleak was observed in four patients (6.9%). Postoperative chimney graft re-intervention rate was 1.7%. The median follow-up was 32 +/- 20 months (range 3-96 months). Overall estimated survival at 12, 50, and 80 months was 100%, 89% and 44%, respectively. Estimated freedom from endoleak at 1, 12, 24, and 36 months was 96.5%, 95%, 95%, and 93%, respectively. One hypogastric artery stent-graft occluded at the 3rd month of follow-up. No reintervention was performed.CONLUSIONS: Our experience with the chimney technique for aortic aneurysms from the aortic arch to the iliac axis shows promising and durable mid- and long-term results. Endograft oversizing, associated with the chimney graft diameter and length choice remain fundamental to reduce the risk of the most frequent procedure complications: type I endoleak and CG occlusion. The wider use of this technique should be justified in patients considered at high risk for open repair and/or not suitable for the custom-made branched/fenestrated endografts.
2019
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/11 - MALATTIE DELL'APPARATO CARDIOVASCOLARE
English
Aortic aneurysm; Endovascular procedures; Endoleak; Thoracic aorta; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Humans; Male; Postoperative Complications; Progression-Free Survival; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stents; Time Factors
Fadda, G.f., Marino, M., Kasemi, H., Di Angelo, C.l., Dionisi, C.p., Cammalleri, V., et al. (2019). Aortic aneurysm endovascular treatment with the parallel graft technique from the aortic arch to the iliac axis. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 60(5), 589-598 [10.23736/S0021-9509.17.09899-8].
Fadda, Gf; Marino, M; Kasemi, H; Di Angelo, Cl; Dionisi, Cp; Cammalleri, V; Setacci, C
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
48.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 2.44 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.44 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/228603
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact