Objectives: Epilepsy management in elderly patients is often complex because of several concomitant comorbidities that may limit the use of some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Levetiracetam (LEV) is a second-generation AED widely used in elderly patients with epilepsy while lacosamide (LCM), which has been recently approved in European Union (EU) as monotherapy for the treatment of focal onset seizures. is affected by a scarcity of data in such frail population. This study is aimed at assessing the efficacy and the tolerability of LCM as monotherapy in elderly patients affected by focal onset epilepsy compared with those receiving LEV.Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients aged >= 65 years suffering from focal onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization on LCM monotherapy or LEV monotherapy, was performed. Data regarding demographic characteristics, seizure type and etiology, LCM and LEV daily dose, number of lifetime AEDs, seizure frequency at baseline and at 12 months of follow-up, and seizure freedom rates were reported.Results: In this observational retrospective study, 22 patients on LCM (10 males, 12 females, mean age: 76.23 +/- 75) and 24 patients on LEV (10 males, 14 females, mean age: 73.58 +/- 639) were enrolled. Mean LCM daily dose was 204.51 +/- 88.51 mg and mean LEV daily dose was 1281.25 +/- 378.15 mg. All patients had comorbidities on chronic treatment. At 12 months of follow-up, mean monthly seizure frequency reduced from 423 +/- 8.53 to 0.33 +/- 0.9 (p < .001) in LCM group and from 2.29 6.11 to 0.2 +/- 0.81 (p < .001) in LEV group. furthermore, 16/22 (72.7%) LCM patients were seizure-free at 12 months of follow-up while seizure freedom was achieved by 17/24 (70.8%) patients in LEV group.Discussion and conclusion: Epilepsy management in elderly patients is often challenging. In this retrospective real-life study, the efficacy and the tolerability of LCM as monotherapy was favorable even at low doses in older patients and comparable with LEV with a high rate of long-term seizure freedom. Considering the frequent comorbidities and the risk of drug-drug interactions, LCM monotherapy may be a valuable option in elderly patients with focal onset epilepsy because of its favorable pharmacolcinetic profile. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

DEL BIANCO, C., Placidi, F., Liguori, C., Mari, L., Ulivi, M., Ornello, R., et al. (2019). Long-term efficacy and safety of lacosamide and levetiracetam monotherapy in elderly patients with focal epilepsy: A retrospective study. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 94, 178-182 [10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.02.022].

Long-term efficacy and safety of lacosamide and levetiracetam monotherapy in elderly patients with focal epilepsy: A retrospective study

DEL BIANCO, CHIARA;Placidi F.;Liguori C.;Pisani A.;Mercuri N. B.;Izzi F.
2019-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: Epilepsy management in elderly patients is often complex because of several concomitant comorbidities that may limit the use of some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Levetiracetam (LEV) is a second-generation AED widely used in elderly patients with epilepsy while lacosamide (LCM), which has been recently approved in European Union (EU) as monotherapy for the treatment of focal onset seizures. is affected by a scarcity of data in such frail population. This study is aimed at assessing the efficacy and the tolerability of LCM as monotherapy in elderly patients affected by focal onset epilepsy compared with those receiving LEV.Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients aged >= 65 years suffering from focal onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization on LCM monotherapy or LEV monotherapy, was performed. Data regarding demographic characteristics, seizure type and etiology, LCM and LEV daily dose, number of lifetime AEDs, seizure frequency at baseline and at 12 months of follow-up, and seizure freedom rates were reported.Results: In this observational retrospective study, 22 patients on LCM (10 males, 12 females, mean age: 76.23 +/- 75) and 24 patients on LEV (10 males, 14 females, mean age: 73.58 +/- 639) were enrolled. Mean LCM daily dose was 204.51 +/- 88.51 mg and mean LEV daily dose was 1281.25 +/- 378.15 mg. All patients had comorbidities on chronic treatment. At 12 months of follow-up, mean monthly seizure frequency reduced from 423 +/- 8.53 to 0.33 +/- 0.9 (p < .001) in LCM group and from 2.29 6.11 to 0.2 +/- 0.81 (p < .001) in LEV group. furthermore, 16/22 (72.7%) LCM patients were seizure-free at 12 months of follow-up while seizure freedom was achieved by 17/24 (70.8%) patients in LEV group.Discussion and conclusion: Epilepsy management in elderly patients is often challenging. In this retrospective real-life study, the efficacy and the tolerability of LCM as monotherapy was favorable even at low doses in older patients and comparable with LEV with a high rate of long-term seizure freedom. Considering the frequent comorbidities and the risk of drug-drug interactions, LCM monotherapy may be a valuable option in elderly patients with focal onset epilepsy because of its favorable pharmacolcinetic profile. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2019
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/26 - NEUROLOGIA
English
AEDs; Elderly; Focal epilepsy; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Monotherapy
DEL BIANCO, C., Placidi, F., Liguori, C., Mari, L., Ulivi, M., Ornello, R., et al. (2019). Long-term efficacy and safety of lacosamide and levetiracetam monotherapy in elderly patients with focal epilepsy: A retrospective study. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 94, 178-182 [10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.02.022].
DEL BIANCO, C; Placidi, F; Liguori, C; Mari, L; Ulivi, M; Ornello, R; Pisani, A; Mercuri, Nb; Izzi, F
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/218153
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact