We consider the stiffness matrices arising from the Galerkin B-spline isogeometric analysis discretization of classical elliptic problems. By exploiting their specific spectral properties, compactly described by a symbol, we design an efficient multigrid method for the fast solution of the related linear systems. The convergence rate of general-purpose multigrid methods, based on classical stationary smoothers, is optimal (i.e., bounded independently of the matrix size), but it also worsens exponentially with respect to the spline degree. The symbol allows us to give a detailed theoretical explanation of this exponential worsening in the case of the two-grid scheme. In addition, thanks to a specific factorization of the symbol, we are able to design an ad hoc multigrid method with an effective preconditioned CG or GMRES smoother at the finest level, in the spirit of the multi-iterative idea. The convergence rate of this multi-iterative multigrid method is not only optimal but also robust (i.e., bounded substantially independently of the spline degree). This can again be explained by the symbol, in combination with the theory of generalized locally Toeplitz sequences. A selected set of numerical experiments confirms our symbol-based analysis, as well as the effectiveness of the proposed multi-iterative multigrid method, also for larger spline degree.

Donatelli, M., Garoni, C., Manni, C., Serra-Capizzano, S., Speleers, H. (2017). Symbol-based multigrid methods for Galerkin B-spline isogeometric analysis. SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 55(1), 31-62 [10.1137/140988590].

Symbol-based multigrid methods for Galerkin B-spline isogeometric analysis

Garoni C.;Manni C.;Speleers H.
2017-01-05

Abstract

We consider the stiffness matrices arising from the Galerkin B-spline isogeometric analysis discretization of classical elliptic problems. By exploiting their specific spectral properties, compactly described by a symbol, we design an efficient multigrid method for the fast solution of the related linear systems. The convergence rate of general-purpose multigrid methods, based on classical stationary smoothers, is optimal (i.e., bounded independently of the matrix size), but it also worsens exponentially with respect to the spline degree. The symbol allows us to give a detailed theoretical explanation of this exponential worsening in the case of the two-grid scheme. In addition, thanks to a specific factorization of the symbol, we are able to design an ad hoc multigrid method with an effective preconditioned CG or GMRES smoother at the finest level, in the spirit of the multi-iterative idea. The convergence rate of this multi-iterative multigrid method is not only optimal but also robust (i.e., bounded substantially independently of the spline degree). This can again be explained by the symbol, in combination with the theory of generalized locally Toeplitz sequences. A selected set of numerical experiments confirms our symbol-based analysis, as well as the effectiveness of the proposed multi-iterative multigrid method, also for larger spline degree.
5-gen-2017
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MAT/08 - ANALISI NUMERICA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Multigrid methods; Preconditioning; Isogeometric analysis; B-splines; Toeplitz matrices
Donatelli, M., Garoni, C., Manni, C., Serra-Capizzano, S., Speleers, H. (2017). Symbol-based multigrid methods for Galerkin B-spline isogeometric analysis. SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 55(1), 31-62 [10.1137/140988590].
Donatelli, M; Garoni, C; Manni, C; Serra-Capizzano, S; Speleers, H
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Donatelli_SINUM_2017_multigrid.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 655.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
655.47 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/215171
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 72
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 54
social impact