The paper aims to demostrate a change in the jurisprudential interpretation of the rules of the XII tables about the killing of the thief. In archaic law, the self-defense was allowed on the objective basis of a theft committed during the night, or during the day by an armed thief. The influence of the lex Aquilia, and particularly of the subjective idea of iniuria – identified with dolus or culpa – led the jurists to admit the self-defense only when the victim subjectively felt an imminent danger.
Cursi, M.f. (2016). L’uccisione del fur nocturnus e diurnus qui se telo defendit tra norma e interpretatio. In Isabella Piro (a cura di), Scritti per Alessandro Corbino (pp. 305-320). Libellula.
L’uccisione del fur nocturnus e diurnus qui se telo defendit tra norma e interpretatio
Cursi maria floriana
2016-01-01
Abstract
The paper aims to demostrate a change in the jurisprudential interpretation of the rules of the XII tables about the killing of the thief. In archaic law, the self-defense was allowed on the objective basis of a theft committed during the night, or during the day by an armed thief. The influence of the lex Aquilia, and particularly of the subjective idea of iniuria – identified with dolus or culpa – led the jurists to admit the self-defense only when the victim subjectively felt an imminent danger.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Scritti Corbino.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
654.29 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
654.29 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.