Introduction: Treatment of pediatric epilepsy requires a careful evaluation of the safety and tolerability profile of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to avoid or minimize as much as possible adverse events (AEs) on various organs, hematological parameters, and growth, pubertal, motor, cognitive and behavioral development.Areas covered: Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) reported in the literature 2000-2018 regarding second- and third-generation AEDs used in the pediatric age, with exclusion of the neonatal period that exhibits specific peculiarities, have been described on the basis of their frequency, severity/tolerability, and particular association with a given AED.Expert opinion: Somnolence/sedation and behavioral changes, like irritability and nervousness, are among the most commonly observed TEAEs associated with almost all AEDs. Lamotrigine, Gabapentin, Oxcarbazepine, and Levetiracetam appear to be the best-tolerated AEDs with a <= 2% withdrawal rate, while Tiagabine and Everolimus are discontinued in up to >20% of the patients because of intolerable TEAEs. For some AEDs, literature data are scanty to draw a high-level evidence on their safety and tolerability profile. The reasons are: insufficient population size, short duration of treatments, or lack of controlled trials. A future goal is that of identifying clearer, easier, and more homogeneous methodological strategies to facilitate AED testing in pediatric populations.

Moavero, R., Pisani, L.r., Pisani, F., Curatolo, P. (2018). Safety and tolerability profile of new antiepileptic drug treatment in children with epilepsy. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 17(10), 1015-1028 [10.1080/14740338.2018.1518427].

Safety and tolerability profile of new antiepileptic drug treatment in children with epilepsy

Moavero R.;Curatolo P.
2018-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment of pediatric epilepsy requires a careful evaluation of the safety and tolerability profile of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to avoid or minimize as much as possible adverse events (AEs) on various organs, hematological parameters, and growth, pubertal, motor, cognitive and behavioral development.Areas covered: Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) reported in the literature 2000-2018 regarding second- and third-generation AEDs used in the pediatric age, with exclusion of the neonatal period that exhibits specific peculiarities, have been described on the basis of their frequency, severity/tolerability, and particular association with a given AED.Expert opinion: Somnolence/sedation and behavioral changes, like irritability and nervousness, are among the most commonly observed TEAEs associated with almost all AEDs. Lamotrigine, Gabapentin, Oxcarbazepine, and Levetiracetam appear to be the best-tolerated AEDs with a <= 2% withdrawal rate, while Tiagabine and Everolimus are discontinued in up to >20% of the patients because of intolerable TEAEs. For some AEDs, literature data are scanty to draw a high-level evidence on their safety and tolerability profile. The reasons are: insufficient population size, short duration of treatments, or lack of controlled trials. A future goal is that of identifying clearer, easier, and more homogeneous methodological strategies to facilitate AED testing in pediatric populations.
2018
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/39 - NEUROPSICHIATRIA INFANTILE
English
New antiepileptic drugs; adverse events; behavior; cognition; drug safety; drug tolerability; pediatric epilepsy; Age Factors; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child Behavior; Epilepsy; Humans; Sleep Stages
Moavero, R., Pisani, L.r., Pisani, F., Curatolo, P. (2018). Safety and tolerability profile of new antiepileptic drug treatment in children with epilepsy. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 17(10), 1015-1028 [10.1080/14740338.2018.1518427].
Moavero, R; Pisani, Lr; Pisani, F; Curatolo, P
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/212760
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact