Intradermal administration of analgesic drugs with mesotherapy is effective for the local treatment of musculoskeletal pain. Few studies analyzed the effects of different drugs administrated with this technique.BACKGROUND: Intradermal administration of analgesic drugs with mesotherapy is effective for the local treatment of musculoskeletal pain. Few studies analyzed the effects of different drugs administrated with this technique. AIM: To compare the efficacy of diclofenac versus lysine acetylsalicylate-based mesotherapy in relieving pain (primary outcome), and disability (secondary outcome) in patients with non- specific chronic low back pain. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation medicine center. POPULATION: Records of 101 patients with non specific chronic low back pain METHODS: Data were extracted from the outpatients records of patients affected by non-specific chronic low back pain since 12 weeks before, treated with 5 sessions of mesotherapy with diclofenac mixtures (Group A) or aspirin-lysine acetylsalicylate mixture (Group B). Assessments recorded were taken before the first treatment (T0), at the end of the 5-week treatment (T1), and at 4 (T2) and 12 weeks (T3) of follow-up after the last treatment, using a pain visual analogue scale (VAS) primary outcome, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) secondary outcome, and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Comparisons within and between groups were performed using the t-test, the chi-square test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) models, as appropriate. RESULTS: 101 patients' records consecutively were analysed, 51 in Group A (mean age and standard deviation (SD) = 62,8±10,7; F/M=33/18) and 50 in Group B (mean age ± SD=64,1±15,8; F/M=30/20). At baseline VAS, SF-MPQ, ODI scores were respectively 7.6±1.3, 22,49±9.96, 44.80±15.55 (mean and SD) in group A; VAS, SF-MPQ, ODI scores were respectively 6.7±1.6, 18.66±9.65, 39.04±16.06(mean and SD) in group B. Mean differences between Group A and Group B in the changes of scores from baseline (T0) to end of study (T3) were -1,3 (VAS), -5,81 (SF-MPQ) and -17,05 (ODI). Mesotherapy induced significant reductions in pain severity and disability in both groups with better results in diclofenac-based treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective pilot study suggests the efficacy and safety of diclofenac mesotherapy for relieving pain and disability in patients affected by chronic non-specific low back pain in a convenient sample but further studies will confirm these results.
Ronconi, G., Ferriero, G., Nigito, C., Foti, C., Maccauro, G., Ferrara, P.e. (2019). Efficacy of intradermal administration of diclofenac for the treatment of non specific chronic low back pain: results from a retrospective observational study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE [10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05432-7].
Efficacy of intradermal administration of diclofenac for the treatment of non specific chronic low back pain: results from a retrospective observational study
Foti, Calogero;
2019-02-15
Abstract
Intradermal administration of analgesic drugs with mesotherapy is effective for the local treatment of musculoskeletal pain. Few studies analyzed the effects of different drugs administrated with this technique.BACKGROUND: Intradermal administration of analgesic drugs with mesotherapy is effective for the local treatment of musculoskeletal pain. Few studies analyzed the effects of different drugs administrated with this technique. AIM: To compare the efficacy of diclofenac versus lysine acetylsalicylate-based mesotherapy in relieving pain (primary outcome), and disability (secondary outcome) in patients with non- specific chronic low back pain. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation medicine center. POPULATION: Records of 101 patients with non specific chronic low back pain METHODS: Data were extracted from the outpatients records of patients affected by non-specific chronic low back pain since 12 weeks before, treated with 5 sessions of mesotherapy with diclofenac mixtures (Group A) or aspirin-lysine acetylsalicylate mixture (Group B). Assessments recorded were taken before the first treatment (T0), at the end of the 5-week treatment (T1), and at 4 (T2) and 12 weeks (T3) of follow-up after the last treatment, using a pain visual analogue scale (VAS) primary outcome, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) secondary outcome, and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Comparisons within and between groups were performed using the t-test, the chi-square test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) models, as appropriate. RESULTS: 101 patients' records consecutively were analysed, 51 in Group A (mean age and standard deviation (SD) = 62,8±10,7; F/M=33/18) and 50 in Group B (mean age ± SD=64,1±15,8; F/M=30/20). At baseline VAS, SF-MPQ, ODI scores were respectively 7.6±1.3, 22,49±9.96, 44.80±15.55 (mean and SD) in group A; VAS, SF-MPQ, ODI scores were respectively 6.7±1.6, 18.66±9.65, 39.04±16.06(mean and SD) in group B. Mean differences between Group A and Group B in the changes of scores from baseline (T0) to end of study (T3) were -1,3 (VAS), -5,81 (SF-MPQ) and -17,05 (ODI). Mesotherapy induced significant reductions in pain severity and disability in both groups with better results in diclofenac-based treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective pilot study suggests the efficacy and safety of diclofenac mesotherapy for relieving pain and disability in patients affected by chronic non-specific low back pain in a convenient sample but further studies will confirm these results.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Efficacy of intradermal administration of diclofenac.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
1.32 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.32 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.