Background: We evaluated the incidence of proven/probable invasive aspergillosis (IA) and the role of antifun- gal prophylaxis (AP) in a ‘real-life’ setting of patients with AML receiving intensive consolidation therapy. Methods: Cases of IA, observed during consolidation in adult/paediatric patients with AML between 2011 and 2015, were retrospectively collected in a multicentre Italian study. Results: Of 2588 patients, 56 (2.2%) developed IA [43 probable (1.7%) and 13 proven (0.5%)]. IA was diagnosed in 34 of 1137 (2.9%) patients receiving no AP and in 22 of 1451 (1.5%) who were given AP (P"0.01). Number- needed-to-treat calculation indicates that, on average, 71 patients should have received AP (instead of no AP) for one additional patient to not have IA. Initial antifungal therapy was ‘pre-emptive’ in 36 (64%) patients and ‘targeted’ in 20 (36%) patients. A good response to first-line therapy was observed in 26 (46%) patients, mainly those who received AP [16 of 22 (73%) versus 10 of 34 (29%); P"0.001]. The overall mortality rate and the mor- tality rate attributable to IA by day 120 were 16% and 9%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age 60 years (OR"12.46, 95% CI"1.13–136.73; P"0.03) and high-dose cytarabine treatment (OR"10.56, 95% CI"1.95– 116.74; P"0.04) independently affected outcome.

Del Principe, M.i., Dragonetti, G., Verga, L., Candoni, A., Marchesi, F., Cattaneo, C., et al. (2019). Real-life analysis of the role of antifungal prophylaxis in preventing invasive aspergillosis in AML patients undergoing consolidation therapy: Sorveglianza Epidemiologica Infezioni nelle Emopatie (SEIFEM) 2016 study. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 74(4), 1062-1068 [10.1093/jac/dky550].

Real-life analysis of the role of antifungal prophylaxis in preventing invasive aspergillosis in AML patients undergoing consolidation therapy: Sorveglianza Epidemiologica Infezioni nelle Emopatie (SEIFEM) 2016 study

Del Principe, Maria Ilaria
Conceptualization
;
Venditti, Adriano
Writing – Review & Editing
;
2019-01-14

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the incidence of proven/probable invasive aspergillosis (IA) and the role of antifun- gal prophylaxis (AP) in a ‘real-life’ setting of patients with AML receiving intensive consolidation therapy. Methods: Cases of IA, observed during consolidation in adult/paediatric patients with AML between 2011 and 2015, were retrospectively collected in a multicentre Italian study. Results: Of 2588 patients, 56 (2.2%) developed IA [43 probable (1.7%) and 13 proven (0.5%)]. IA was diagnosed in 34 of 1137 (2.9%) patients receiving no AP and in 22 of 1451 (1.5%) who were given AP (P"0.01). Number- needed-to-treat calculation indicates that, on average, 71 patients should have received AP (instead of no AP) for one additional patient to not have IA. Initial antifungal therapy was ‘pre-emptive’ in 36 (64%) patients and ‘targeted’ in 20 (36%) patients. A good response to first-line therapy was observed in 26 (46%) patients, mainly those who received AP [16 of 22 (73%) versus 10 of 34 (29%); P"0.001]. The overall mortality rate and the mor- tality rate attributable to IA by day 120 were 16% and 9%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age 60 years (OR"12.46, 95% CI"1.13–136.73; P"0.03) and high-dose cytarabine treatment (OR"10.56, 95% CI"1.95– 116.74; P"0.04) independently affected outcome.
14-gen-2019
Online ahead of print
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/15 - MALATTIE DEL SANGUE
English
AML, SEIFEM, Invasive Aspergillosis, consolidation therapy, antifumgal prophylaxis, antifungal therapy
https://academic.oup.com/jac/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jac/dky550/5289513
Del Principe, M.i., Dragonetti, G., Verga, L., Candoni, A., Marchesi, F., Cattaneo, C., et al. (2019). Real-life analysis of the role of antifungal prophylaxis in preventing invasive aspergillosis in AML patients undergoing consolidation therapy: Sorveglianza Epidemiologica Infezioni nelle Emopatie (SEIFEM) 2016 study. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 74(4), 1062-1068 [10.1093/jac/dky550].
Del Principe, Mi; Dragonetti, G; Verga, L; Candoni, A; Marchesi, F; Cattaneo, C; Delia, M; Potenza, L; Farina, F; Ballanti, S; Decembrino, N; Castagnola, C; Nadali, G; Fanci, R; Orciulo, E; Veggia, B; Offidani, M; Melillo, L; Manetta, S; Tumbarello, M; Venditti, A; Busca, A; Aversa, F; Pagano, L
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Del Principe - SEIFEM Surveillance Post-CONS.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 173.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
173.16 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/208243
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact