Autoimmune rheumatic diseases are characterised by an abnormal immune system response, complement activation, cytokines dysregulation and inflammation. In last years, despite many progresses in managing these patients, it has been shown that clinical remission is reached in less than 50% of patients and a personalised and tailored therapeutic approach is still lacking resulting in a significant gap between guidelines and real-world practice. In this context, the need for biomarkers facilitating early diagnosis and profiling those individuals at the highest risk for a poor outcome has become of crucial interest. A biomarker generally refers to a measured characteristic which may be used as an indicator of some biological state or condition. Three different types of medical biomarkers has been suggested: i. mechanistic markers; ii. clinical disease markers; iii. therapeutic markers. A combination of biomarkers from these different groups could be used for an ideal more accurate diagnosis and treatment. However, although a growing body of evidence is focused on improving biomarkers, a significant amount of this information is not integrated on standard clinical care. The overarching aim of this work was to clarify the meaning of specific biomarkers during autoimmune diseases; their possible role in confirming diagnosis, predicting outcome and suggesting specific treatments.

Giacomelli, R., Afeltra, A., Alunno, A., Bartoloni-Bocci, E., Berardicurti, O., Bombardieri, M., et al. (2019). Guidelines for biomarkers in autoimmune rheumatic diseases - evidence based analysis. AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS, 18(1), 93-106 [10.1016/j.autrev.2018.08.003].

Guidelines for biomarkers in autoimmune rheumatic diseases - evidence based analysis

Chimenti, Maria Sole;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases are characterised by an abnormal immune system response, complement activation, cytokines dysregulation and inflammation. In last years, despite many progresses in managing these patients, it has been shown that clinical remission is reached in less than 50% of patients and a personalised and tailored therapeutic approach is still lacking resulting in a significant gap between guidelines and real-world practice. In this context, the need for biomarkers facilitating early diagnosis and profiling those individuals at the highest risk for a poor outcome has become of crucial interest. A biomarker generally refers to a measured characteristic which may be used as an indicator of some biological state or condition. Three different types of medical biomarkers has been suggested: i. mechanistic markers; ii. clinical disease markers; iii. therapeutic markers. A combination of biomarkers from these different groups could be used for an ideal more accurate diagnosis and treatment. However, although a growing body of evidence is focused on improving biomarkers, a significant amount of this information is not integrated on standard clinical care. The overarching aim of this work was to clarify the meaning of specific biomarkers during autoimmune diseases; their possible role in confirming diagnosis, predicting outcome and suggesting specific treatments.
gen-2019
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
English
Antiphospholipid syndrome; Biomarker; Rheumatoid arthritis; Sjögren syndrome; Spondyloarthritides; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Systemic sclerosis
Giacomelli, R., Afeltra, A., Alunno, A., Bartoloni-Bocci, E., Berardicurti, O., Bombardieri, M., et al. (2019). Guidelines for biomarkers in autoimmune rheumatic diseases - evidence based analysis. AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS, 18(1), 93-106 [10.1016/j.autrev.2018.08.003].
Giacomelli, R; Afeltra, A; Alunno, A; Bartoloni-Bocci, E; Berardicurti, O; Bombardieri, M; Bortoluzzi, A; Caporali, R; Caso, F; Cervera, R; Chimenti, ...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/207845
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 47
  • Scopus 99
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 87
social impact