Participants in the De Nederlandsche Bank Household Survey (DHS) were asked for how much they would require as to accept a delay in receiving a financial reward. The answers of most participants indicate present-bias as they require a higher annualized nominal rate of return for a three month delay than for a twelve month delay. One way to deal with one's present-bias problem is to impose limits on future spending by holding wealth in non liquid assets. We therefore predict that agents with more severe present-bias problems hold a lower share of their wealth as money. Our data provide statistically significant evidence in support of this prediction.
Millemaci, E., Waldmann, R. (2016). Present-Biased Preferences and Money Demand. ECONOMIST-NETHERLANDS, 164(2), 187-207 [10.1007/s10645-016-9274-3].
Present-Biased Preferences and Money Demand
Millemaci E.;Waldmann Robert
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2016-01-01
Abstract
Participants in the De Nederlandsche Bank Household Survey (DHS) were asked for how much they would require as to accept a delay in receiving a financial reward. The answers of most participants indicate present-bias as they require a higher annualized nominal rate of return for a three month delay than for a twelve month delay. One way to deal with one's present-bias problem is to impose limits on future spending by holding wealth in non liquid assets. We therefore predict that agents with more severe present-bias problems hold a lower share of their wealth as money. Our data provide statistically significant evidence in support of this prediction.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
di24_2011.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
238.52 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
238.52 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.