The thermal conductivity data of 40 Canadian soils at dryness (lambda(dry)) and at full saturation (lambda(sat)) were used to verify 13 predictive models, i.e., four mechanistic, four semi-empirical and five empirical equations. The performance of each model, for lambda(dry) and lambda(sat), was evaluated using a standard deviation (SD) formula. Among the mechanistic models applied to dry soils, the closest lambda(dry) estimates were obtained by MaxRTCM (SD = +/- 0.018 Wm(-1).K-1), followed by de Vries and a series-parallel model (S-||). Among the semi-empirical equations (deVries-ave, Advanced Geometric Mean Model (A-GMM), Chaudhary and Bhandari (C-B) and Chen's equation), the closest lambda(dry) estimates were obtained by the C-B model (+/- 0.022 Wm(-1).K-1). Among the empirical equations, the top lambda(dry) estimates were given by CDry-40 (+/- 0.021 Wm(-1).K-1 and +/- 0.018 Wm(-1).K-1 for18-coarse and 22-fine soils, respectively). In addition, lambda(dry) and lambda(sat) models were applied to the lambda(sat) database of 21 other soils. From all the models tested, only the maxRTCM and the CDry-40 models provided the closest lambda(dry) estimates for the 40 Canadian soils as well as the 21 soils. The best lambda(sat) estimates for the 40-Canadian soils and the 21 soils were given by the A-GMM and the S-|| model.
Tarnawski, V.r., Mccombie, M.l., Leong, W.h., Coppa, P., Corasaniti, S., Bovesecchi, G. (2018). Canadian Field Soils IV: Modeling Thermal Conductivity at Dryness and Saturation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMOPHYSICS, 39(3) [10.1007/s10765-017-2357-9].
Canadian Field Soils IV: Modeling Thermal Conductivity at Dryness and Saturation
Coppa P.;Corasaniti S.;Bovesecchi G.;Bovesecchi, Gianluigi
2018-01-01
Abstract
The thermal conductivity data of 40 Canadian soils at dryness (lambda(dry)) and at full saturation (lambda(sat)) were used to verify 13 predictive models, i.e., four mechanistic, four semi-empirical and five empirical equations. The performance of each model, for lambda(dry) and lambda(sat), was evaluated using a standard deviation (SD) formula. Among the mechanistic models applied to dry soils, the closest lambda(dry) estimates were obtained by MaxRTCM (SD = +/- 0.018 Wm(-1).K-1), followed by de Vries and a series-parallel model (S-||). Among the semi-empirical equations (deVries-ave, Advanced Geometric Mean Model (A-GMM), Chaudhary and Bhandari (C-B) and Chen's equation), the closest lambda(dry) estimates were obtained by the C-B model (+/- 0.022 Wm(-1).K-1). Among the empirical equations, the top lambda(dry) estimates were given by CDry-40 (+/- 0.021 Wm(-1).K-1 and +/- 0.018 Wm(-1).K-1 for18-coarse and 22-fine soils, respectively). In addition, lambda(dry) and lambda(sat) models were applied to the lambda(sat) database of 21 other soils. From all the models tested, only the maxRTCM and the CDry-40 models provided the closest lambda(dry) estimates for the 40 Canadian soils as well as the 21 soils. The best lambda(sat) estimates for the 40-Canadian soils and the 21 soils were given by the A-GMM and the S-|| model.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
18 IJOT.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
999.82 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
999.82 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.