Let Y ⊆ ℙN be a possibly singular projective variety, defined over the field of complex numbers. Let X be the intersection of Y with h general hypersurfaces of sufficiently large degrees. Let d > 0 be an integer, and assume that dimY = n + h and dimYsing ≤ min {d + h − 1, n − 1}. Let Z be an algebraic cycle on Y of dimension d + h, whose homology class in H2(d+h)(Y; ℚ) is nonzero. In the present article, we prove that the restriction of Z to X is not algebraically equivalent to zero. This is a generalization to the singular case of a result due to Nori in the case Y is smooth. As an application we provide explicit examples of singular varieties for which homological equivalence is different from the algebraic one.

Let Y ⊆ ℙN be a possibly singular projective variety, defined over the field of complex numbers. Let X be the intersection of Y with h general hypersurfaces of sufficiently large degrees. Let d > 0 be an integer, and assume that dimY = n + h and dimYsing ≤ min {d + h − 1, n − 1}. Let Z be an algebraic cycle on Y of dimension d + h, whose homology class in H2(d+h)(Y; ℚ) is nonzero. In the present article, we prove that the restriction of Z to X is not algebraically equivalent to zero. This is a generalization to the singular case of a result due to Nori in the case Y is smooth. As an application we provide explicit examples of singular varieties for which homological equivalence is different from the algebraic one.

DI GENNARO, V., Franco, D., Marini, G. (2016). Algebraic versus homological equivalence for singular varieties. COMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA, 44(6), 2547-2560 [10.1080/00927872.2015.1053904].

Algebraic versus homological equivalence for singular varieties

Di Gennaro Vincenzo;Marini Giambattista
2016-01-01

Abstract

Let Y ⊆ ℙN be a possibly singular projective variety, defined over the field of complex numbers. Let X be the intersection of Y with h general hypersurfaces of sufficiently large degrees. Let d > 0 be an integer, and assume that dimY = n + h and dimYsing ≤ min {d + h − 1, n − 1}. Let Z be an algebraic cycle on Y of dimension d + h, whose homology class in H2(d+h)(Y; ℚ) is nonzero. In the present article, we prove that the restriction of Z to X is not algebraically equivalent to zero. This is a generalization to the singular case of a result due to Nori in the case Y is smooth. As an application we provide explicit examples of singular varieties for which homological equivalence is different from the algebraic one.
2016
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MAT/03 - GEOMETRIA
English
Let Y ⊆ ℙN be a possibly singular projective variety, defined over the field of complex numbers. Let X be the intersection of Y with h general hypersurfaces of sufficiently large degrees. Let d > 0 be an integer, and assume that dimY = n + h and dimYsing ≤ min {d + h − 1, n − 1}. Let Z be an algebraic cycle on Y of dimension d + h, whose homology class in H2(d+h)(Y; ℚ) is nonzero. In the present article, we prove that the restriction of Z to X is not algebraically equivalent to zero. This is a generalization to the singular case of a result due to Nori in the case Y is smooth. As an application we provide explicit examples of singular varieties for which homological equivalence is different from the algebraic one.
Algebraic cycle; Algebraic equivalence; Chow variety; Connectivity Theorem; Hilbert scheme; Homological equivalence; Projective variety; Singularity;
DI GENNARO, V., Franco, D., Marini, G. (2016). Algebraic versus homological equivalence for singular varieties. COMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA, 44(6), 2547-2560 [10.1080/00927872.2015.1053904].
DI GENNARO, V; Franco, D; Marini, G
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/198043
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact