Both the economic and psychological literature suggest that household waste reduction and recycling behaviors are driven by different motivators. In this article, we investigate whether any relationship exists between waste reduction and recycling efforts and, in this case, if they turn out to be complements or substitutes in individuals' preferences. Our theoretical results, supported by empirical evidence for England, suggest that waste policies and environmental motivations may affect recycling and waste reduction both directly and indirectly, through their reciprocal interactions.
D'Amato, A., Mancinelli, S., Zoli, M. (2016). Complementarity vs substitutability in waste management behaviors. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 123, 84-94 [10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.12.005].
Complementarity vs substitutability in waste management behaviors
D'Amato A.;Zoli M.
2016-01-01
Abstract
Both the economic and psychological literature suggest that household waste reduction and recycling behaviors are driven by different motivators. In this article, we investigate whether any relationship exists between waste reduction and recycling efforts and, in this case, if they turn out to be complements or substitutes in individuals' preferences. Our theoretical results, supported by empirical evidence for England, suggest that waste policies and environmental motivations may affect recycling and waste reduction both directly and indirectly, through their reciprocal interactions.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ecoleco_preprint.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Pre-print
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
609.3 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
609.3 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.