Self-reported 'personal recovery' and clinical recovery in schizophrenia (SRPR and CR, respectively) reflect different perspectives in schizophrenia outcome, not necessarily concordant with each other and usually representing the consumer's or the therapist's point of view. By means of a cluster analysis on SRPR-related variables, we identified three clusters. The first and third cluster included subjects with the best and the poorest clinical outcome respectively. The second cluster was characterized by better insight, higher levels of depression and stigma, lowest self-esteem and personal strength, and highest emotional coping. The first cluster showed positive features of recovery, while the third cluster showed negative features. The second cluster, with the most positive insight, showed a more complex pattern, a somewhat 'paradoxical' mixture of positive and negative personal and clinical features of recovery. The present results suggest the need for a characterization of persons with schizophrenia along SRPR and CR dimensions to design individualized and integrated treatment programs aimed to improve insight and coping strategies, reduce stigma, and shape recovery styles.

Amore M., R.a., Galderisi, S., Rocca, P., Bertolino, A., Aguglia, E., Amodeo, G., et al. (2018). The complex relationship between self-reported 'personal recovery' and clinical recovery in schizophrenia. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 192, 108-112 [10.1016/j.schres.2017.04.040].

The complex relationship between self-reported 'personal recovery' and clinical recovery in schizophrenia

A., Siracusano;R., Rossi;C., Niolu;G., Di Lorenzo;M., Ribolsi;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Self-reported 'personal recovery' and clinical recovery in schizophrenia (SRPR and CR, respectively) reflect different perspectives in schizophrenia outcome, not necessarily concordant with each other and usually representing the consumer's or the therapist's point of view. By means of a cluster analysis on SRPR-related variables, we identified three clusters. The first and third cluster included subjects with the best and the poorest clinical outcome respectively. The second cluster was characterized by better insight, higher levels of depression and stigma, lowest self-esteem and personal strength, and highest emotional coping. The first cluster showed positive features of recovery, while the third cluster showed negative features. The second cluster, with the most positive insight, showed a more complex pattern, a somewhat 'paradoxical' mixture of positive and negative personal and clinical features of recovery. The present results suggest the need for a characterization of persons with schizophrenia along SRPR and CR dimensions to design individualized and integrated treatment programs aimed to improve insight and coping strategies, reduce stigma, and shape recovery styles.
2018
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/25 - PSICHIATRIA
English
Clinical recovery; Cluster analysis; Insight; Personal recovery; Recovery styles; Schizophrenia
Amore M., R.a., Galderisi, S., Rocca, P., Bertolino, A., Aguglia, E., Amodeo, G., et al. (2018). The complex relationship between self-reported 'personal recovery' and clinical recovery in schizophrenia. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 192, 108-112 [10.1016/j.schres.2017.04.040].
Amore M., Ra; Galderisi, S; Rocca, P; Bertolino, A; Aguglia, E; Amodeo, G; Bellomo, A; Bucci, P; Buzzanca, A; Carpiniello, B; Comparelli, A; Dell'Osso, L; di Giannantonio, M; Mancini, M; Marchesi, C; Monteleone, P; Montemagni, C; Oldani, L; Roncone, R; Siracusano, A; Stratta, P; Tenconi, E; Vignapiano, A; Vita, A; Zeppegno, P; Maj, M; Rossetti, Mc; Rossi, R; Santarelli, V; Giusti, L; Malavolta, M; Salza, A; Palumbo, D; Patriarca, S; Chieffi, M; Attrotto, Mt; Colagiorgio, L; Andriola, I; Atti, Ar; Barlati, S; Deste, G; Galluzzo, A; Pinna, F; Deriu, L; Sanna, L; Signorelli, Ms; Minutolo, G; Cannavó, D; Martinotti, G; Acciavatti, T; Corbo, M; Altamura, M; Carnevale, R; Malerba, S; Murri, Mb; Calcagno, P; Bugliani, M; Serati, M; de Bartolomeis, A; Gramaglia, C; Gattoni, E; Gambaro, E; Collantoni, E; Cremonese, C; Rossi, E; Ossola, P; Tonna, M; De Panfilis, C; Rutigliano, G; Gesi, C; Carmassi C. l Biondi, M; Girardi, P; Brugnoli, R; Di Fabio, F; Di Pietro, S; Girardi, N; Niolu, C; Di Lorenzo, G; Ribolsi, M; Corrivetti, G; Pinto, G; Longobardi, N; Fagiolini, A; , Goracci,, A; , Bolognesi,, S; , Bellino,, S; Villari, ; , Bracale,, N
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/193201
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 20
  • Scopus 43
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
social impact