Treatment recommendations are based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, only about 1 in 20 people meet the inclusion criteria for RCTs forming consensus guidelines in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Consequently, the one-size-fits-all approach focused merely on traditional symptoms and risk of exacerbations is inadequate to treat COPD. COPD needs a personalized medicine strategy because of the relevance of COPD heterogeneity for subject-based health risk assessment and stratification in the clinical arena. Areas covered: Since the therapeutic approach proposed by the 2017 GOLD report takes no account of COPD heterogeneity, the advances with the current pharmacological options and the different approaches focused on phenotypes of COPD that can be used in an attempt to respond to unmet therapeutic needs are reviewed. Expert commentary: The one-size-fits-all approach that focuses solely on traditional symptoms and risk of exacerbations is inadequate to treat COPD. COPD needs a personalized medicine strategy because of the relevance of COPD heterogeneity. Phenotyping provides potential for a more personalized approach than the former model of care because it allows clustering patients defined by clinical characteristics and sharing common clinical outcomes. However, it is still too much of a simplistic method that, in any case, must be validated in future clinical studies.

Cazzola, M., Rogliani, P., Puxeddu, E., Ora, J., Matera, M.g. (2018). An overview of the current management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: can we go beyond the GOLD recommendations?. EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 12(1), 43-54 [10.1080/17476348.2018.1398086].

An overview of the current management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: can we go beyond the GOLD recommendations?

Cazzola M.;Rogliani P.;Puxeddu E.;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Treatment recommendations are based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, only about 1 in 20 people meet the inclusion criteria for RCTs forming consensus guidelines in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Consequently, the one-size-fits-all approach focused merely on traditional symptoms and risk of exacerbations is inadequate to treat COPD. COPD needs a personalized medicine strategy because of the relevance of COPD heterogeneity for subject-based health risk assessment and stratification in the clinical arena. Areas covered: Since the therapeutic approach proposed by the 2017 GOLD report takes no account of COPD heterogeneity, the advances with the current pharmacological options and the different approaches focused on phenotypes of COPD that can be used in an attempt to respond to unmet therapeutic needs are reviewed. Expert commentary: The one-size-fits-all approach that focuses solely on traditional symptoms and risk of exacerbations is inadequate to treat COPD. COPD needs a personalized medicine strategy because of the relevance of COPD heterogeneity. Phenotyping provides potential for a more personalized approach than the former model of care because it allows clustering patients defined by clinical characteristics and sharing common clinical outcomes. However, it is still too much of a simplistic method that, in any case, must be validated in future clinical studies.
2018
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/10 - MALATTIE DELL'APPARATO RESPIRATORIO
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
COPD; anti-inflammatory agents; augmentation therapy; bronchodilators; mucolytics; phenotypes; precision medicine; treatment of comorbidities
Cazzola, M., Rogliani, P., Puxeddu, E., Ora, J., Matera, M.g. (2018). An overview of the current management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: can we go beyond the GOLD recommendations?. EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 12(1), 43-54 [10.1080/17476348.2018.1398086].
Cazzola, M; Rogliani, P; Puxeddu, E; Ora, J; Matera, Mg
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/192006
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact