The Growth Differentiation Factor 11 (GDF11) has been controversially involved in the aging/rejuvenation process. To clarify whether GDF11 is differently expressed during aging, we have evaluated GDF11 levels in skeletal muscles and hippocampi of young and old mice, sedentary or subjected to a 12-weeks triweekly training protocol. The results of real-time PCR and Western blot analyses indicate that skeletal muscles of sedentary old mice express higher levels of GDF11 compared to young animals (p < 0.05). Conversely, in hippocampi no significant differences of GDF11 expression are detected. Analysis of long-term potentiation, a synaptic plasticity phenomenon, reveals that population spikes in response to a tetanic stimulus are significantly higher in sedentary young mice than in old animals (p < 0.01). Training induces a significant improvement of long-term potentiation in both young and old animals (p < 0.05), an increase (p < 0.05) of skeletal muscle GDF11 levels in young mice and a reduction of GDF11 expression in hippocampi of old mice (p < 0.05). Overall, data suggest that GDF11 can be considered an aging biomarker for skeletal muscles. Moreover, physical exercise has a positive impact on long-term potentiation in both young and old mice, while it has variable effects on GDF11 expression depending on age and on the tissue analyzed.

De Domenico, E., D'Arcangelo, G., Faraoni, I., Palmieri, M., Tancredi, V., Graziani, G., et al. (2017). Modulation of GDF11 expression and synaptic plasticity by age and training. ONCOTARGET, 8(35), 57991-58002 [10.18632/oncotarget.19854].

Modulation of GDF11 expression and synaptic plasticity by age and training

D'arcangelo G.;Faraoni I.;Palmieri M.;Tancredi V.;Graziani G.;Grimaldi P.;Tentori L.
2017-01-01

Abstract

The Growth Differentiation Factor 11 (GDF11) has been controversially involved in the aging/rejuvenation process. To clarify whether GDF11 is differently expressed during aging, we have evaluated GDF11 levels in skeletal muscles and hippocampi of young and old mice, sedentary or subjected to a 12-weeks triweekly training protocol. The results of real-time PCR and Western blot analyses indicate that skeletal muscles of sedentary old mice express higher levels of GDF11 compared to young animals (p < 0.05). Conversely, in hippocampi no significant differences of GDF11 expression are detected. Analysis of long-term potentiation, a synaptic plasticity phenomenon, reveals that population spikes in response to a tetanic stimulus are significantly higher in sedentary young mice than in old animals (p < 0.01). Training induces a significant improvement of long-term potentiation in both young and old animals (p < 0.05), an increase (p < 0.05) of skeletal muscle GDF11 levels in young mice and a reduction of GDF11 expression in hippocampi of old mice (p < 0.05). Overall, data suggest that GDF11 can be considered an aging biomarker for skeletal muscles. Moreover, physical exercise has a positive impact on long-term potentiation in both young and old mice, while it has variable effects on GDF11 expression depending on age and on the tissue analyzed.
2017
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore BIO/09 - FISIOLOGIA
Settore BIO/14 - FARMACOLOGIA
English
GDF11; Gerotarget; exercise; hippocampus; long-term potentiation; skeletal muscle
De Domenico, E., D'Arcangelo, G., Faraoni, I., Palmieri, M., Tancredi, V., Graziani, G., et al. (2017). Modulation of GDF11 expression and synaptic plasticity by age and training. ONCOTARGET, 8(35), 57991-58002 [10.18632/oncotarget.19854].
De Domenico, E; D'Arcangelo, G; Faraoni, I; Palmieri, M; Tancredi, V; Graziani, G; Grimaldi, P; Tentori, L
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ModulationGDF.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 974.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
974.23 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/190148
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact