Few studies have yielded information on comparative effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) procedures in a real-world setting. The aim of this analysis is to describe procedural and post-procedural outcomes in a TAVI/SAVR intermediate risk propensity-matched population.
D'Errigo, P., Barbanti, M., Ranucci, M., Onorati, F., Covello, R., Rosato, S., et al. (2013). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: Results from an intermediate risk propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 167(5), 1945-1952 [10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.028].
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: Results from an intermediate risk propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT study
Ruvolo, GMembro del Collaboration Group
;Nardi, PMembro del Collaboration Group
;Pisano, CMembro del Collaboration Group
2013-01-01
Abstract
Few studies have yielded information on comparative effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) procedures in a real-world setting. The aim of this analysis is to describe procedural and post-procedural outcomes in a TAVI/SAVR intermediate risk propensity-matched population.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
