Objectives: Retention of subjects in HIV treatment programmes is crucial for the success of treatment. We evaluated retention/loss to follow-up (LTFU) in subjects receiving established care in Malawi. Methods: Data for HIV-positive patients registered in Drug Resource Enhancement Against AIDS and Malnutrition centres in Malawi prior to 2014 were reviewed. Visits entailing HIV testing/counselling, laboratory evaluations, nutritional evaluation/supplementation, community support, peer education, and antiretroviral (ART) monitoring/pharmacy were noted. LTFU was defined as > 90 days without an encounter. Parameters potentially associated with LTFU were explored, with univariate/multivariate logistic regression analyses being performed. Results: Fifteen thousand and ninety-nine patients registered before 2014; 202 (1.3%) were lost to follow-up (LTFU) (1.3%). Nine (0.5%) of 1744 paediatric patients were LTFU vs. 1.4% (n = 193) of 13 355 adults (P < 0.001). Subjects who were LTFU had fewer days in care than retained subjects (1338 vs. 1544, respectively; P < 0.001) and a longer duration of ART (1530 vs. 1300 days, respectively; P < 0.001). Subjects who were LTFU had higher baseline HIV viral loads (P = 0.016) and higher body mass indexes (P < 0.001), were more likely to live in urban settings (88% of patients who were LTFU lived in urban settings) with better housing [relative risk (RR) 2.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67-3.09; P < 0.001], and were more likely to be educated (RR 1.88; 95% CI 1.42-2.50; P < 0.001). Distance to the centre and cost of transportation were associated with LTFU (RR 3.4; 95% CI 2.84-5.37; P < 0.001), as was absence of a maternal figure (RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.17-2.09; P < 0.001). Viral load, distance index, education and a maternal figure were predictive of LTFU. Conclusions: Educated, urbanized HIV-infected adults living far from programme centres are at high risk of LTFU, particularly if there is no maternal figure in the household. These variables must be taken into consideration when developing retention strategies. © 2017 British HIV Association.
Mancinelli, S., Nielsen Saines, K., Germano, P., Guidotti, G., Buonomo, E., Scarcella, P., et al. (2017). Who will be lost? Identifying patients at risk of loss to follow-up in Malawi. The DREAM Program Experience. HIV MEDICINE [10.1111/hiv.12492].
Who will be lost? Identifying patients at risk of loss to follow-up in Malawi. The DREAM Program Experience
MANCINELLI, SANDRO;BUONOMO, ERSILIA;SCARCELLA, PAOLA;Orlando, S;LIOTTA, GIUSEPPE;PALOMBI, LEONARDO
2017-01-01
Abstract
Objectives: Retention of subjects in HIV treatment programmes is crucial for the success of treatment. We evaluated retention/loss to follow-up (LTFU) in subjects receiving established care in Malawi. Methods: Data for HIV-positive patients registered in Drug Resource Enhancement Against AIDS and Malnutrition centres in Malawi prior to 2014 were reviewed. Visits entailing HIV testing/counselling, laboratory evaluations, nutritional evaluation/supplementation, community support, peer education, and antiretroviral (ART) monitoring/pharmacy were noted. LTFU was defined as > 90 days without an encounter. Parameters potentially associated with LTFU were explored, with univariate/multivariate logistic regression analyses being performed. Results: Fifteen thousand and ninety-nine patients registered before 2014; 202 (1.3%) were lost to follow-up (LTFU) (1.3%). Nine (0.5%) of 1744 paediatric patients were LTFU vs. 1.4% (n = 193) of 13 355 adults (P < 0.001). Subjects who were LTFU had fewer days in care than retained subjects (1338 vs. 1544, respectively; P < 0.001) and a longer duration of ART (1530 vs. 1300 days, respectively; P < 0.001). Subjects who were LTFU had higher baseline HIV viral loads (P = 0.016) and higher body mass indexes (P < 0.001), were more likely to live in urban settings (88% of patients who were LTFU lived in urban settings) with better housing [relative risk (RR) 2.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67-3.09; P < 0.001], and were more likely to be educated (RR 1.88; 95% CI 1.42-2.50; P < 0.001). Distance to the centre and cost of transportation were associated with LTFU (RR 3.4; 95% CI 2.84-5.37; P < 0.001), as was absence of a maternal figure (RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.17-2.09; P < 0.001). Viral load, distance index, education and a maternal figure were predictive of LTFU. Conclusions: Educated, urbanized HIV-infected adults living far from programme centres are at high risk of LTFU, particularly if there is no maternal figure in the household. These variables must be taken into consideration when developing retention strategies. © 2017 British HIV Association.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2017 Who_will_be_lost-HIV_Medicine.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
78.34 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
78.34 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.