Many methods have been developed to analyse protein sequences and structures, although less work has been undertaken describing and comparing protein surfaces. Evolution can lead sequences to diverge or structures to change topology; nevertheless, surface determinants that are essential to protein function itself may be mantained. Moreover, different molecules could converge to similar functions by gaining specific surface determinants. In such cases, sequence or structure comparisons are likely to be inadequate in describing or identifying protein functions and evolutionary relationships among proteins. Surface analysis can identify function determinants that are independent of sequence or secondary structure and can therefore be a powerful tool to highlight cases of possible convergent or divergent evolution. This kind of approach can be useful for a better understanding of protein molecular and biochemical mechanisms of catalysis or interaction with a ligand, which are usually surface dependent. Protein surface comparison, when compared to sequence or structure comparison methods, is a hard computational challenge and evaluated methods allowing the comparison of protein surfaces are difficult to find. In this review, we will survey the current knowledge about protein surface similarity and the techniques to detect it.

Via, A., Ferrè, F., Brannetti, B., HELMER CITTERICH, M. (2000). Protein surface similarities: a survey of methods to describe and compare protein surfaces. CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES, 57(13-14), 1970-1977 [doi:10.1007/PL00000677].

Protein surface similarities: a survey of methods to describe and compare protein surfaces

HELMER CITTERICH, MANUELA
2000-12-01

Abstract

Many methods have been developed to analyse protein sequences and structures, although less work has been undertaken describing and comparing protein surfaces. Evolution can lead sequences to diverge or structures to change topology; nevertheless, surface determinants that are essential to protein function itself may be mantained. Moreover, different molecules could converge to similar functions by gaining specific surface determinants. In such cases, sequence or structure comparisons are likely to be inadequate in describing or identifying protein functions and evolutionary relationships among proteins. Surface analysis can identify function determinants that are independent of sequence or secondary structure and can therefore be a powerful tool to highlight cases of possible convergent or divergent evolution. This kind of approach can be useful for a better understanding of protein molecular and biochemical mechanisms of catalysis or interaction with a ligand, which are usually surface dependent. Protein surface comparison, when compared to sequence or structure comparison methods, is a hard computational challenge and evaluated methods allowing the comparison of protein surfaces are difficult to find. In this review, we will survey the current knowledge about protein surface similarity and the techniques to detect it.
1-dic-2000
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore BIO/11 - BIOLOGIA MOLECOLARE
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Models, Molecular; Computational Biology; Computer Simulation; Surface Properties; Protein Conformation; Proteins; Binding Sites; Algorithms
Via, A., Ferrè, F., Brannetti, B., HELMER CITTERICH, M. (2000). Protein surface similarities: a survey of methods to describe and compare protein surfaces. CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES, 57(13-14), 1970-1977 [doi:10.1007/PL00000677].
Via, A; Ferrè, F; Brannetti, B; HELMER CITTERICH, M
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Via_etal_2000b.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: invited review
Dimensione 374.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
374.59 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/15497
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 57
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 50
social impact