In this study, a systematic analysis of the dependence on stimulus level and primary frequency ratio r of the different components of human distortion product otoacoustic emissions has been performed, to check the validity of theoretical models of their generation, as regards the localization of the sources and the relative weight of distortion and reflection generation mechanisms. 2f1 - f2 and 2f2 - f1 distortion product otoacoustic emissions of 12 normal hearing ears from six human subjects have been measured at four different levels, in the range [35, 65] dB sound pressure level, at eight different ratios, in the range [1.1, 1.45]. Time-frequency filtering was used to separate distortion and reflection components. Numerical simulations have also been performed using an active nonlinear cochlear model. Both in the experiment and in the simulations, the behavior of the 2f1 - f2 distortion and reflection components was in agreement with previous measurements and with the predictions of the two-source model. The 2f2 - f1 response showed a rotating-phase component only, whose behavior was in general agreement with that predicted for a component generated and reflected within a region basal to the characteristic place of frequency 2f2 - f1, although alternative interpretations, which are also discussed, cannot be ruled out.

Botti, T., Sisto, R., Sanjust, F., Moleti, A., D'Amato, L. (2016). Distortion product otoacoustic emission generation mechanisms and their dependence on stimulus level and primary frequency ratio. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 139(2), 658-673 [10.1121/1.4941248].

Distortion product otoacoustic emission generation mechanisms and their dependence on stimulus level and primary frequency ratio

SANJUST, FILIPPO;MOLETI, ARTURO;
2016-01-01

Abstract

In this study, a systematic analysis of the dependence on stimulus level and primary frequency ratio r of the different components of human distortion product otoacoustic emissions has been performed, to check the validity of theoretical models of their generation, as regards the localization of the sources and the relative weight of distortion and reflection generation mechanisms. 2f1 - f2 and 2f2 - f1 distortion product otoacoustic emissions of 12 normal hearing ears from six human subjects have been measured at four different levels, in the range [35, 65] dB sound pressure level, at eight different ratios, in the range [1.1, 1.45]. Time-frequency filtering was used to separate distortion and reflection components. Numerical simulations have also been performed using an active nonlinear cochlear model. Both in the experiment and in the simulations, the behavior of the 2f1 - f2 distortion and reflection components was in agreement with previous measurements and with the predictions of the two-source model. The 2f2 - f1 response showed a rotating-phase component only, whose behavior was in general agreement with that predicted for a component generated and reflected within a region basal to the characteristic place of frequency 2f2 - f1, although alternative interpretations, which are also discussed, cannot be ruled out.
2016
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore FIS/07 - FISICA APPLICATA (A BENI CULTURALI, AMBIENTALI, BIOLOGIA E MEDICINA)
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Botti, T., Sisto, R., Sanjust, F., Moleti, A., D'Amato, L. (2016). Distortion product otoacoustic emission generation mechanisms and their dependence on stimulus level and primary frequency ratio. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 139(2), 658-673 [10.1121/1.4941248].
Botti, T; Sisto, R; Sanjust, F; Moleti, A; D'Amato, L
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JASA2016a.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 8.61 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.61 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/142747
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact