Most accelerator-based space radiation experiments have been performed with single ion beams at fixed energies. However, the space radiation environment consists of a wide variety of ion species with a continuous range of energies. Due to recent developments in beam switching technology implemented at the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory (NSRL) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), it is now possible to rapidly switch ion species and energies, allowing for the possibility to more realistically simulate the actual radiation environment found in space. The present paper discusses a variety of issues related to implementation of galactic cosmic ray (GCR) simulation at NSRL, especially for experiments in radiobiology. Advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to developing a GCR simulator are presented. In addition, issues common to both GCR simulation and single beam experiments are compared to issues unique to GCR simulation studies. A set of conclusions is presented as well as a discussion of the technical implementation of GCR simulation.

Norbury, J., Schimmerling, W., Slaba, T., Azzam, E., Badavi, F., Baiocco, G., et al. (2016). Galactic cosmic ray simulation at the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory. LIFE SCIENCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 8, 38-51 [10.1016/j.lssr.2016.02.001].

Galactic cosmic ray simulation at the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory

NARICI, LIVIO;
2016

Abstract

Most accelerator-based space radiation experiments have been performed with single ion beams at fixed energies. However, the space radiation environment consists of a wide variety of ion species with a continuous range of energies. Due to recent developments in beam switching technology implemented at the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory (NSRL) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), it is now possible to rapidly switch ion species and energies, allowing for the possibility to more realistically simulate the actual radiation environment found in space. The present paper discusses a variety of issues related to implementation of galactic cosmic ray (GCR) simulation at NSRL, especially for experiments in radiobiology. Advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to developing a GCR simulator are presented. In addition, issues common to both GCR simulation and single beam experiments are compared to issues unique to GCR simulation studies. A set of conclusions is presented as well as a discussion of the technical implementation of GCR simulation.
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore FIS/01 - Fisica Sperimentale
Settore FIS/07 - Fisica Applicata(Beni Culturali, Ambientali, Biol.e Medicin)
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Galactic cosmic ray simulation; Space radiation;
Norbury, J., Schimmerling, W., Slaba, T., Azzam, E., Badavi, F., Baiocco, G., et al. (2016). Galactic cosmic ray simulation at the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory. LIFE SCIENCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 8, 38-51 [10.1016/j.lssr.2016.02.001].
Norbury, J; Schimmerling, W; Slaba, T; Azzam, E; Badavi, F; Baiocco, G; Benton, E; Bindi, V; Blakely, E; Blattnig, S; Boothman, D; Borak, T; Britten, R; Curtis, S; Dingfelder, M; Durante, M; Dynan, W; Eisch, A; Elgart, S; Goodhead, D; Guida, P; Heilbronn, L; Hellweg, C; Huff, J; Kronenberg, A; La Tessa, C; Lowenstein, D; Miller, J; Morita, T; Narici, L; Nelson, G; Norman, R; Ottolenghi, A; Patel, Z; Reitz, G; Rusek, A; Schreurs, A; Scott Carnell, L; Semones, E; Shay, J; Shurshakov, V; Sihver, L; Simonsen, L; Story, M; Turker, M; Uchihori, Y; Williams, J; Zeitlin, C
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2016LSSR_Galactic_cosmic.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 628.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
628.33 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/141524
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 96
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 82
social impact