To compare the surgical outcome of robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Patrizi, L. (2013). Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A case control study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 41(1), 142-147 [10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.018].

Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A case control study

PATRIZI, LODOVICO
2013-01-01

Abstract

To compare the surgical outcome of robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
2013
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/40 - GINECOLOGIA E OSTETRICIA
English
Locally advanced cervical cancer; Minimally invasive surgery; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Robotic radical hysterectomy; Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell; Adult; Aged; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Case-Control Studies; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Pelvis; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Young Adult; Neoadjuvant Therapy
Patrizi, L. (2013). Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A case control study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 41(1), 142-147 [10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.018].
Patrizi, L
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/139372
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact