All species concepts are rooted in reproductive, and ultimately genealogical, relations. Genetic data are thus the most important source of information for species delimitation. Current ease of access to genomic data and recent computational advances are blooming a plethora of coalescent-based species delimitation methods. Despite their utility as objective approaches to identify species boundaries, coalescent-based methods (1) rely on simplified demographic models that may fail to capture some attributes of biological species, (2) do not make explicit use of the geographic information contained in the data, and (3) are often computationally intensive. In this article, we present a case of species delimitation in the Erebia tyndarus species complex, a taxon regarded as a classic example of problematic taxonomic resolution. Our approach to species delimitation used genomic data to test predictions rooted in the biological species concept and in the criterion of coexistence in sympatry. We (1) obtained restriction-site associated DNA (RAD) sequencing data from a carefully designed sample, (2) applied two genotype clustering algorithms to identify genetic clusters, and (3) performed within-clusters and between-clusters analyses of isolation by distance as a test for intrinsic reproductive barriers. Comparison of our results with those from a Bayes factor delimitation coalescent-based analysis, showed that coalescent-based approaches may lead to overconfident splitting of allopatric populations, and indicated that incorrect species delimitation is likely to be inferred when an incomplete geographic sample is analyzed. While we acknowledge the theoretical justification and practical usefulness of coalescent-based species delimitation methods, our results stress that, even in the phylogenomic era, the toolkit for species delimitation should not dismiss more traditional, biologically grounded, approaches coupling genomic data with geographic information.

Gratton, P., Trucchi, E., Trasatti, A., Riccarducci, G., Marta, S., Allegrucci, G., et al. (2016). Testing Classical Species Properties with Contemporary Data: how 'Bad Species' in the Brassy Ringlets (Erebia tyndarus complex, Lepidoptera) Turned Good. SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, (2016) 65(2), 292-303 [10.1093/sysbio/syv087].

Testing Classical Species Properties with Contemporary Data: how 'Bad Species' in the Brassy Ringlets (Erebia tyndarus complex, Lepidoptera) Turned Good

GRATTON, PAOLO;TRUCCHI, EMILIANO;TRASATTI, ALESSANDRA;RICCARDUCCI, GIORGIO;MARTA, SILVIO;ALLEGRUCCI, GIULIANA;CESARONI, DONATELLA;SBORDONI, VALERIO
2016-11

Abstract

All species concepts are rooted in reproductive, and ultimately genealogical, relations. Genetic data are thus the most important source of information for species delimitation. Current ease of access to genomic data and recent computational advances are blooming a plethora of coalescent-based species delimitation methods. Despite their utility as objective approaches to identify species boundaries, coalescent-based methods (1) rely on simplified demographic models that may fail to capture some attributes of biological species, (2) do not make explicit use of the geographic information contained in the data, and (3) are often computationally intensive. In this article, we present a case of species delimitation in the Erebia tyndarus species complex, a taxon regarded as a classic example of problematic taxonomic resolution. Our approach to species delimitation used genomic data to test predictions rooted in the biological species concept and in the criterion of coexistence in sympatry. We (1) obtained restriction-site associated DNA (RAD) sequencing data from a carefully designed sample, (2) applied two genotype clustering algorithms to identify genetic clusters, and (3) performed within-clusters and between-clusters analyses of isolation by distance as a test for intrinsic reproductive barriers. Comparison of our results with those from a Bayes factor delimitation coalescent-based analysis, showed that coalescent-based approaches may lead to overconfident splitting of allopatric populations, and indicated that incorrect species delimitation is likely to be inferred when an incomplete geographic sample is analyzed. While we acknowledge the theoretical justification and practical usefulness of coalescent-based species delimitation methods, our results stress that, even in the phylogenomic era, the toolkit for species delimitation should not dismiss more traditional, biologically grounded, approaches coupling genomic data with geographic information.
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore BIO/05
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Species delimitation, RAD sequencing, isolation by distance, next-generation sequencing, genotype clustering, parapatric species, alpine butterflies, Erebia
https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/65/2/292/2427487/Testing-Classical-Species-Properties-with
Gratton, P., Trucchi, E., Trasatti, A., Riccarducci, G., Marta, S., Allegrucci, G., et al. (2016). Testing Classical Species Properties with Contemporary Data: how 'Bad Species' in the Brassy Ringlets (Erebia tyndarus complex, Lepidoptera) Turned Good. SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, (2016) 65(2), 292-303 [10.1093/sysbio/syv087].
Gratton, P; Trucchi, E; Trasatti, A; Riccarducci, G; Marta, S; Allegrucci, G; Cesaroni, D; Sbordoni, V
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gratton et al-SystBiol-2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 7.02 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.02 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2108/137641
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact